甘肃“对赌协议案”判决之评析——以法律方法的运用为视角

Comment on the Judgment of“Gambling Agreement Case”of Gansu——From the Perspective of the Use of Legal Methods

疑难案件是各种法律方法尤其是非常规法律方法运用的主要场域。甘肃"对赌协议案"作为新型疑难案件,兼具事实定性困难和冲突型法律选择困难。对赌协议条款属新型无名合同条款,欲解决其定性难题须综合运用多种合同解释方法。该案中涉及的民间法与国家法、民间法与其他社会规范间的冲突是两种不同法律体系之间的法律冲突,其冲突的消解无法借助于效力识别方法,只能仰仗于利益衡量方法。运用利益衡量方法消解以上冲突的具体规则是:(1)合同等民间法优于国家法或其他社会规范的任意性规定;(2)国家法或其他社会规范的强行性规定优于合同等民间法;(3)合同等民间法的有效推定规则。正确并妥当地解释该案涉及的国家法和其他社会规范的相关强行性规定的含义是运用利益衡量方法消解以上冲突的前提和基础。

Disputed and difficult cases are the major field of the use of legal methods especially non - conventional methods. As a new difficult case, “ gambling agreement case” of Gansu both has the difficulty of nature determination of fact and the difficulty of conflict type of law choice. In order to solve nature determination problem of Gambling terms which are new unnamed terms, various legal methods must be comprehensively use. The conflict of civil law and state law or other social norms are conflict be- tween two different legal systems, which can not be solved by validity identification method, which must be solved by interest measure method. The specific rules of interest measure method are： （ 1 ） civil law such as contract are superior to the arbitrary rules of national law or other social norms; （2） compulsory rules of national law or other social norms are superior to civil law such as contract; （3） the rule of effective presumption of civil law such as contract. Proper interpretation of the relevant compul- sory rules of national law or other social norms is the premise and foundation to solve the above - mentioned conflict by interest measure method.