形态分析的舞蹈评论——新时期舞蹈评论的职业化取向(上)

Morphology Analysis of Dance Reviews:Dance comments in the New Era of Professional Orientation(1)

"评论何用"与"评者何为"具有某种内在的关联性,这种"关联性"的程度维系着"职业化"的作为。如果我们想做一个"职业化"的舞蹈评者或舞蹈论家,如果我们想让自己的评说论作"踏石留印、抓铁有痕",不妨梳理一下"新时期舞蹈评论的职业化取向",在这个三十余年的历程中,笔者也是亲力亲为者之一。当笔者以职业化的眼光来梳理舞蹈评论的"职业化取向",认识到这个"职业化"的基石是对评论对象的"形态分析"。尤其是读到那些具有精当"形态分析"的舞蹈评论时,才再一次理解了什么叫"有的放矢",什么叫"言之有物",什么叫"顺理成章"。本文将以上、中、下三编,对此进行系统、细致的梳理、回顾与反思。

＂ Comment＂ and ＂ critics of what＂ have some sort of inherent relevance, and this ＂ relevance＂ level maintain ＂professional＂ as well. If we want to be a ＂professional＂ danee critic and dance theorist, we may wish to sort out the ＂professionalorientated dance reviews in new period＂ in the course of the more than 30 years. The paper argues that the ＂ professional＂ is the cornerstone of the comment object ＂ morphological analysis＂ in the perspective of professionalization. Especially when reading the reviews with a precise ＂ speciation＂ dancing comment, we would understand what ＂ targeted＂ , what is ＂ meaningful＂ and what is ＂natural＂. Divided into three parts, the paper gives meticulous and systematic examination with retrospection and introspection.