摘要
目的:评价胸腔置管引流治疗胸腔积液的效果和优势。方法:资料完整的97例中大量胸腔积液患者进行回顾性分析。根据治疗方法不同分为胸腔置管引流组(观察组,n=58)和穿刺抽液组(对照组,n=39)。对两组的治疗效果、平均胸水吸收时间、住院时间和并发症的发生率等进行比较分析。结果:胸腔置管的总体有效率显著高于胸腔穿刺抽液(P<0.05);同时可以显著减少胸水的平均吸收时间和住院时间(P<0.05);显著降低传统治疗引起的并发症(P<0.05)。结论:采用胸腔置管引流治疗中大量胸腔积液具有创伤小,治愈率高,并发症少的优点。
Objective:To evaluate the therapeutic effect of catheter implantation for the drainage of pleural effusion. Methods:The medical data of 97 patients with massive pleural effusion were analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups:(1) the observation group (n=58):the central venous catheter was implanted for the drainage of pleural ef-fusion.(2)the control group(n=39):the traditional chest puncture was undergone. The differences of therapeutic effect, average absorbed time of pleural effusion, duration of hospital stay, and complications were compared between two groups.Results:therapeutic effect of observation group was significantly higher than control group. The patients in ob-servation group had lower absorbed time of pleural effusion, decreased duration of hospital stay, and lesser complicat ions(P〈0.05).Conclusion:Catheter implantation for the drainage of pleural effusion is of the advantages of better ther-apeutic effect, minor invasiveness, and lesser complications, which should be suggested as the first line therapeutic strategy for the massive pleural effusion.
出处
《安徽卫生职业技术学院学报》
2014年第2期46-47,共2页
Journal of Anhui Health Vocational & Technical College
关键词
胸腔积液
闭式引流
中心静脉导管
Pleural effusion Closed drainage Central venous catheter