期刊文献+

卫生资源优先次序分配的政府治理研究——国际研究述评及对我国的启示 被引量:7

Governance on priority setting of health resource allocation: International research review and its implication for China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 卫生资源优先次序分配作为政府有效治理的重要领域,在我国仍缺乏类似层面的综合思考。西方在该领域的研究趋势已从单纯的经济学思考走向了政治经济学、制度约束、卫生筹资的全面分析,并在更宏大的组织和政治情境中,考量政府的治理范围、手段,建构操作性强的优先次序分配框架。在卫生决策实践中,找寻跨学科工具的最佳组合考验着决策者的治理水平。本文梳理政治学、卫生经济学、哲学、法学、循证医学等不同学科对卫生资源优先次序分配的思考。最后明确政府卫生资源治理的层次、治理策略建议,强调卫生决策从"作为结构的治理"走向"作为过程的治理"的发展规律因应我国所面临的挑战。 Priority setting of health resource allocation depends on effective and comprehensive governmentbased stewardship,the national research of which lacks comprehensive considerations. The paper articulates the trend of western research from solo economic analysis to a combined comprehension of political economies,systemic constraints and health financing,to consider the scope,strategy and enforced framework for government rationing within a larger organizational and political context. In the health decision-making practice,the best formula for interdisciplinary tools is a test of stewardship capacity. A multi-disciplinary approach from the perspectives of politics,health economies,philosophy,law and evidence-based medicine must be adopted for the priority setting of health resource allocation. Finally,a clear stewardship phased objective is proposed as well as strategies,with emphasis on health decisions from "stewardship as structure"to "stewardship as a process"with challenges that lie ahead.
作者 峗怡
出处 《中国卫生政策研究》 CSCD 2014年第11期24-29,共6页 Chinese Journal of Health Policy
基金 国家社科基金青年项目(13CZX082)
关键词 卫生资源 分配 优先次序分配 治理 Health resource Allocation Prioritization Governance
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Murray C, Frenk J. A Framework for Assessing the Perform- ance of Health Systems [ J ]. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2000, 78(6): 717-731.
  • 2Pierre J, Peters G B. Governing complex societies: Trajecto- ries and scenarios [ M ]. Basingstoke : Palgrave MacMillan, 2005.
  • 3Travis P, Egger D, Davies P, et al. Towards better steward- ship : concepts and critical issues [ C ]. Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy Discussion Papers, 2002.
  • 4Baltussen R. Priority setting of public spending in developing countries:do not try to do everything for everybody [ J]. Health Policy, 2006, 78(2-3) : 149-156.
  • 5Clark S, Weale A. Social values in health priority setting: a conceptual framework [ J ]. Journal of health organization and management, 2012, 26(3): 293-316.
  • 6Hauck K, Smith P C, Goddard M. The Economics of Priori- ty Setting for Health Care : A Literature Review [ R ]. HNP discussion paper, 2003.
  • 7Smith N, Mitton C, Peacock S, et al. Identifying research priorities for health care priority setting: a collaborative effort between managers and researchers [ J ]. BMC Health Serv- ices Research, 2009, 9: 165.
  • 8Sibbald S L, Singer P A, Upshur R, et al. Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for suc- cessful priority setting [ J ]. BMC Health Service Research, 2009, 9: 43.
  • 9Kapiriri L, Bondy S J. Health practitioners' and health planners' information needs and seeking behavior for decision making in Uganda [ J ]. International Journal of Medical In- formatics, 2006, 75(10-11): 714-721.
  • 10Mooney G, Wiseman V. Burden of disease and priority set- ting[ J ]. Health Economics, 2000, 9 (5) : 369-372.

二级参考文献25

  • 1刘继同.卫生政策的“国策”地位与卫生政治学的战略思考[J].中国卫生经济,2006,25(9):16-18. 被引量:7
  • 2吴邦国.《在形成中国特色社会主义法律体系座谈会上的讲话》,《人民日报》,2011年1月27日.
  • 3(美)D.A.Kindig:《为人群购买健康:按健康结果付费》,石光等译,北京:人民卫生出版,2001年版.
  • 4(中)赵启正,(美)约翰.奈斯比特:《对话中国模式》,北京:新世界出版社,2010年版.
  • 5袁祥,王逸吟,徐显明:《法治建设非凡历程60年大致可分五个阶段》,《光明日报》,2009年9月3日.
  • 6侯欣-:《走向民主与法治的国度-改革开放30年中国法治建设回顾》,天津:天津人民出版社,2008年版.
  • 7卫生部政策法规司:《新编常用卫生法规汇编》,北京:法律出版社,2006年版.
  • 8《中共中央、国务院关于深化医药卫生体制改革的意见》,人民日报,2009年4月7日.
  • 9《中华人民共和国宪法注释本》,北京:法律出版社,2006年版.
  • 10中华人民共和国卫生部官方网站:www.MOH.GOV.CN.

共引文献10

同被引文献57

引证文献7

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部