期刊文献+

医患沟通质量影响因素研究对医院管理的启示 被引量:7

The Study on Influence of Doctor-patient Communication Quality and Its Enlightenment for Hospital Management
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的为医院提高医患沟通质量提供参考建议。方法研究采用问卷调查的方法,对问卷进行了独立样本检验、方差分析和多重比较分析。结果发放问卷1600份,回收有效问卷1300份,量表部分缺失数据不超过20%的问卷678份。统计分析发现患者性别、年龄、学历、初诊复诊对医患沟通质量评价没有显著影响,而患者的费用支付方式显著影响其沟通质量评价,报销患者比自费患者和医保卡支付患者评价较高。结论建议医生对不同性别、年龄、学历和就诊经历的患者都提供翔实的信息,而对不同支付方式的患者要有针对性的沟通,建议医院管理者对医患沟通过程进行标准化管理和对医生进行相关培训。 Objective:To provide suggestions for hospitals to improve doctor-patient communication quality. Methods: Questionnaires survey was used and independent sample test, analysis of variance and multiple comparison analysis were made. Results:Totally 1600 questionnaires were distributed, ]300 valid questionnaires were collected, 678 with no more than 5 missing data within scale were analyzed. There were no significant differences in the assessment of doctor-patient communication according to the sex, age, educational level and their experiences. However, expenditure payment had sig- nificant impact on patients' assessment of communication quality. Conclusion:It is suggested that doctor provide detailed information for patients with different gender, age, educational background and experiences and have targeted communica- tion with different payment patients. The hospital manage to standardize the process of doctor-patient communication man- agement and related training for doctors.
出处 《中国医学伦理学》 2014年第6期773-776,共4页 Chinese Medical Ethics
基金 山东省软科学项目:医患沟通效果影响因素及对策研究 项目编号:2009RKB259
关键词 医患沟通质量 费用 支付方式 沟通 医院管理 Doctor-patient Communication Quality Expense Pattern of Payment Communication Hospital Man-agement
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Boulet JR, Mckinley DW, Norcini J, et al. Assess- ing the comparability of standardized patient and physician evaluations of clinical skills [ J ]. Ad- vances in Health Sciences Education, 2002, ( 7 ) : 85-97.
  • 2Beckman H. B. , Markakis K. M. , Suchma A. L. The Doctor-Patient Relationship and Malpractice [ J]. Arch Int Med, 1994,154 : 1365-1370.
  • 3刘本智,滕志香.医患沟通质量评价量表设计[J].中华医院管理杂志,2013,29(9):672-675. 被引量:12

二级参考文献17

  • 1Boulet JR, Mckinley DW, Norcini J, et al. Assessing the compa- rability of standardized patient and physician evaluations of clinical skills [J]. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2002, 7(2): 85-97.
  • 2Stewart M,Brown J, Donner A, et al. The impact of patient- centered care on outcomes [J]. Journal of Family Practice, 2000, 49(9): 796-804.
  • 3Baumann M,Euller-Ziegler L, Guillemin F. Evaluation of the expectations osteoarthritis patients have concerning health-care, and their implications for practitioners [J ]. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 2007, 25(3): 404-409.
  • 4Beckman HB, Markakis KM, Suchrna AL. The doctor-patient relationship and malpraetice: lessons from plaintiff depositions [J]. Arch Int Med, 1994, 154(12): 1365-1370.
  • 5Makoul G. Essential elements of communication in medical encounters: the Kalamazoo consensus statement [J]. Acad Med, 2001, 76(4): 390-393.
  • 6Baumann M,Baumann C,Le Bihan E,et al. How patients perceive the therapeutic communications skills of practitioners, and how that perception affects adherence: use of the TCom- skill GP scale in a specific geographical area[J]. BMC Health Services Research, 2008, 8: 244-232.
  • 7Humphris GM,Kaney S. The Liverpool brief assessment sys- tem for communication skills in the making of doctors[J]. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 2001, 6: 69-80.
  • 8Jeanne AT, Mildred R, Katja OW, et al. The development and psychometric analyses of ADEPT: an instrument for assessing the interactions between doctors and their elderly patients[J]. The Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2005, 30(3): 225-242.
  • 9Mercer SW,Watt GCM, Maxwell M, et al. The development and preliminary validation of the Consultation and Relational Empathy(CARE) measure: an empathy-based consultation process measure[J]. Family Practice, 2004, 21(6) : 699-705.
  • 10Jennifer N,Ralf D,Jutta H. Rating scales for the assessment of empathic communication in medical interviews (REM): scale development, reliability and validity[J]. J Clin Psychol Med Settings, 2007, 14: 367-375.

共引文献11

同被引文献63

引证文献7

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部