普通法传统与香港基本法的实施被引量：11

Common Law Tradition and Enforcement of Hong Kong Basic Law

导出

摘要香港基本法实施以来,特区法院在有关案件中多次重申"普通法传统",借以阐明基本法的含义、推动相关法律原则与规则的发展。在"一国两制"的背景下,香港的普通法传统既有助于延续香港长久以来的法治传统,也有助于因应社会变迁,促进基本法法理不断趋于完善。普通法作为香港原有法律制度最重要的组成部分之一,对基本法的顺利实施至关重要。同时,基本法作为香港特区宪制性法律,也会给香港的普通法传统注入新的内涵。 Since the Hong Kong Basic Laws taking into effect in 1997, the courts of the Region have reiterated the ＂com- mon law tradition＂ many times in cases to facilitate the interpretation of the Basic Law provisions and the development of relat- ed legal doctrines and principles. In the context of the ＂one country two systems＂ policy, the common law tradition in Hong Kong is beneficial to both the preservation of the rule of law in the Region and facing the challenge of changing society by enric- hing the jurisprudence of the Basic Law. On one hand, the common law, as the vital part of the original legal system in Hong Kong, is indispensible to the implementation of the Basic Law; while on the other hand, the Basic Law, as the constitutional instrument of the Region, is bringing new norms into the existing common law in Hong Kong.

作者黄明涛

机构地区中国人民大学法学院

出处《法学评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期39-52,共14页 Law Review

基金全国人大常委会基本法委员会的港澳基本法研究项目"普通法传统对'一国两制'及香港基本法实施的影响研究"的中期成果国家社会科学基金项目"香港基本法框架下立法权与行政权互动关系之研究"(项目批准号:13AFX004)的资助

关键词普通法普通法传统香港基本法一国两制 Common Law Common Law Tradition Hong Kong Basic Law ＂One Country Two Systems＂

分类号 D921.9 [政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献56

1Peter Wesley-Smith,An Introduction to the Hong Kong Legal System,third editon,Oxford University Press,1998,at 37.
2Yash Ghai,Hong Kong’s New Constitutional Order,The Resumption of Chinese Sovereignty and the Basic Law,second Ed.Hong Kong University Press,1999,p350.
3CAQL 1/1997.
4Ng Ka Ling and Others v Director of Immigration,[1999]1HKLRD 315. g g g.
5Xiao Weiyun and others,Why the Court of Final Appeal Was Wrong:Comments of the Mainland Scholars on the Judgment of the Court of Final Appeal,Johannes M M Chan,H L Fu and Yash Ghai edited,Hong Kong's Constitutional Debate:Conflict Over Interpretation,Hong Kong University Press,2000,at 53.
6[1999]1HKLRD 315,at 346.
7[1999]1HKLRD 315,at 355.
8[1999]1HKLRD 315,at 338-339.
9Evelyn Ellis,Sources of Law and the Hierarchy of Norms,David Feldman edited,Oxford Principles of English Law,English Public Law,Oxford University Press,2009,at 61.
10李蕊佚.议会主权下的英国弱型违宪审查[J].法学家,2013(2):164-175. 被引量：26