摘要
音乐史是一门研究人类音乐活动历程的学科,它应当且必须做到尽可能地还原音乐历史的真实状况。20世纪西方艺术音乐领域呈现出两种相互对立的二元性创新,一种为抛弃传统的弃旧标新,另一种为基于传统的立旧出新。两者同时并举、对立统一地汇聚成20世纪西方艺术音乐之历史长河。不过,在目前我国西方音乐史教科书的"20世纪音乐"章节中,普遍存在着强调前者淡化后者的现象。这种片面性表述既有悖于史学学理,又与西方20世纪音乐发展的实际状况不符。笔者希望这种史实与教材相悖现象能引起音乐学术界的重视并给予修正。
The musical history is a discipline to study of human activity course ; it shall and has to do as much as possible to restore the true state of musical history. There were two contradictory duality innovation existed in the field of 20th century Western art music, one was to abandon the traditional that discarding the old and starting new in order to be different, the other was based on the traditional that bring forth the new through the old. Simultaneously, both of them unity of opposite formed the history of 20th century Western art music. However, in the section "20th century music" of the textbook related to the Western music history in China at present, there were existed the widespread phenomenon that stressed the former and diluted the lat- ter. This one-sided statement was contrary to the scientific principle of historiography, but also inconsistent with the actual state of the development of West music in 20th century. The author hope this phenomenon that the historical facts had been different from the teaching material could cause the attention of music academic circles and give corrections.
出处
《黄钟(武汉音乐学院学报)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第4期26-31,共6页
Huangzhong:Journal of Wuhan Conservatory of Music
基金
四川音乐学院资助科研项目研究成果
关键词
20世纪
西方艺术音乐
历史
创新
教材
问题
20th century
Western art music
history
innovation
teaching material
issue