期刊文献+

刍议正当持票人的认定标准——以英美法为中心

Discussion on the Standard of Holder in Due Course——Centered on the Anglo-American Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 正当持票人制度的诞生和发展是商事需求发展的需要。这种优先于一般持票人权利的特权需要通过严格而明确的标准予以确定,这些严格要求包含:对价、善意以及不知情。对于这些条件的正确理解,是确定正当持票人身份的关键所在。 The development of the holder in due course system is the need for commercial development. The privileges prior to the general holder rights will need to be determined by strict standard, which include: value for, in good faith and without notice. For a correct understanding of these conditions, the key is to determine the identity of the holder in due course.
作者 孙超 叶天娇
机构地区 中国政法大学
出处 《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》 2014年第4期71-73,共3页 Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
关键词 正当持票人 对价 善意 不知情 holder in due course consideration in good faith without notice
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Maggs, Gregory E.The Holder in Due Course Doctrine as a Default Rule [ J ].Georgia Law Review, 1998, ( 32 ).
  • 2William D. Hawkland & Lary Lawrence. Uniform Com- mercial Code Series [M].West Group, 1994:4.
  • 3Beutel. Comparison of the Proposed Commercial Code, Ar- ticle 3,and the Negotiable Instruments Law [J]. Neb. L. Rev,1951, (30).
  • 4Frankelstein. Article Three-Commercial Paper [J].Tenn.L. Rev. 1953, (22).
  • 5Long. Notice in Equity[J ].Harv. L. Rev,1920, (34).
  • 649 Nw. U. L. Rev. 417.
  • 7See Webite&Summers,Uniform Commercial Code 481 (1972).
  • 8Cases e.g.: Vitols v. Citizens Banking Co.,10 F.3d 1227,1963.
  • 9Amercican Plan v.Woods,240 N.E,2d, 1968.
  • 10Arcanum National Bank v.Hessler,433 N.E,2d,204,1982.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部