期刊文献+

合作网络视角下的学科演化模型 被引量:1

Modeling the Evolution of Disciplines from the Perspective of Co-authorship Network
下载PDF
导出
摘要 揭示学科产生、演化和消亡的规律是研究者们一直以来努力的目标。这些规律可以为学科发展趋势的预测提供参考信息,指导科研人员的选题,对于资源分配、学科发展规划的制定等也具有重要意义。本文提出一种基于Agent的学科演化模型,其中学科的产生和演化是由作者合作网络中社区结构的演化驱动的。模型中包含三个元素,作者、文献和学科,演化机制分为作者选择、知识传播和学科演化三部分。实验结果表明,本文提出的模型可以很好的解释实际观察到的学科、作者和文献之间的若干关系模式,以及合作网络的若干特性,揭示了作者交互信息在学科演化中的重要作用。 Uncovering the patterns of the birth, evolution and decline of disciplines has always been an endeavor of researchers. The patterns are of critical importance for providing information about the prediction of discipline evolution, guiding the selection of research topics, allocating resources and planning toward discipline development. Here we propose an agent-based model, in which the birth and evolution of disciplines follow the evolution of community structures of co- authorship networks. There are three elements in the model including author, paper and disciplines. The mechanisms include author selection, knowledge diffusion and discipline evolution. The results show that the model could explain a number of stylized facts about the relationships between disciplines, authors and papers, and the characteristics of co-authorship networks, which provide strong support for the key role of author interactions in shaping the evolution of disciplines.
出处 《情报学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第9期936-943,共8页 Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(编号:61277370) 辽宁省自然科学基金(编号:201202031)
关键词 学科演化 合作网络 社区结构 交叉领域合作 discipline evolution, co-authorship network, community structure, interdisciplinary collaboration
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Roco M C,Bainbridge W S. Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science [ M ]. Dordrecht, The Nethertands Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.
  • 2Brner K, Scharnhorst A. Visual conceptualizations and models of science [ J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2009, 3 (3) : 161-172.
  • 3Btirner K, Glanzel W, Scharnhorst A, et al. Modeling science: studying the structure and dynamics of science [J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 89(1): 347-348.
  • 4Sehamhorst A, Btirner K, and Besselaar P. Models of Science Dynamics: Encounters Between Complexity Theory and Information Sciences[ M]. Springer, 2012.
  • 5张金柱,张晓林.利用引用科学知识突变识别突破性创新[J].情报学报,2014,33(3):259-266. 被引量:48
  • 6De Solla Price D J. Little Science, Big Science and Beyond [ M ]. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.
  • 7Kuhn T S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions [ M ]. University of Chicago press, 2012.
  • 8Crane D. Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities [ M ]. University of Chicago Press, 1972.
  • 9Wagner C S. The New Invisible College: Science for Development [ M ]. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2008.
  • 10Mulkay M J. Three models of scientific development [ J ]. The Sociological Review, 1975, 23 (3) : 509-526.

二级参考文献15

  • 1高峰,杨廷郊.文献的直接引用与间接引用的比较和N阶引用问题的探讨[J].情报科学,1989,10(4):44-47. 被引量:3
  • 2Sood A ,Tellis G J. Technological evolution and radical innovation[ J]. Journal of Marketing, 2005 : 152-168.
  • 3Christensen C M. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail [ M ]. Boston: Harvard Business Press, 1997.
  • 4Christensen C M,Johnson M W, Rigby D K. Foundations for growth: how to identify and build disruptive new businesses[J]. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2002, 43(3) : 21-31.
  • 5Committee on Forecasting Future Disruptive Technologies. Persistent Forecasting of Disruptive Technologies [ M ]. Washington, D. C. :The National Academies Press, 2009.
  • 6Committee on Forecasting Future Disruptive Technologies. Persistent forecasting of disruptive technologies - report 2 [ M ]. Washington, D. C. : The National Academies Press, 2009.
  • 7Yu D, Hang C C. A reflective review of disruptive innovation theory [ J ]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2010, 12(4) : 435-452.
  • 8Schoenmakers W , Duysters G. The technological origins of radical inventions [ J ]. Research Policy, 2010, 39 ( 8 ) : 1051-1059.
  • 9Arthur W B. The Nature of Technology: What it is and How it Evolves[ M ]. Free Pr, 2009.
  • 10Callaert J, Grouwels J, Van Looy B. Delineating the scientific footprint in technology: Identifying scientific publications within non-patent references [ J ]. Scientometrics, 2012, 91(2): 383-398.

共引文献47

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部