摘要
批判作为重要的哲学思维方式,反思是其最为明显的特点。反思所具有的鲜明的主体性特征就决定了任何批判都有着明确的语境要求。理论和实践是批判所指向的两大基本语境。康德与马克思的批判分别是在理论和实践领域中展开的。理论的求真性和实践的求善性就决定了这两者在批判的方式与方法有着极为重要的差异性。但这两者也有一些共同之处,即他们都极其敏锐地把握住了时代的脉搏,在理论和实践领域以异曲同工之效高扬了人的主体性特征,在有力地推动时代前进的同时,也充分地彰显了批判的思想魅力。
The criticism is an important way of philosophical thinking,and reflection is the most obvious characteristics of it. The reflection has distinct subjectivity characteristics,which determines that any demand criticism has a clear context. The theory and practice are two basic contexts to be pointed for the criticism. The criticism of Kant and Marx was spread in the theory and practice's field. The quality that theory is for reality and practice is for goodness decides that the way and method of criticism have important difference. However,they have something in common,which to hold the pulse of the times sharply,to emphasis on the human's subjectivity in different way,to promote the progressive of the era,at the same time,to demonstrate critical thinking's charm fully,too.
出处
《山东农业大学学报(社会科学版)》
2014年第4期88-92,117,共5页
Journal of Shandong Agricultural University(Social Science Edition)