期刊文献+

罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼双管法硬膜外分娩镇痛的有效性研究 被引量:2

Efficacy of Ropivacaine Together with Sufentanil in Double-catheter Epidural Analgesia During Labor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼双管法硬膜外分娩镇痛的临床效果。方法:收集2013年1月-2014年1月本院200例患者,随机分为对照组和试验组,每组各100例。对照组予单管法硬膜外分娩镇痛,试验组予双管法硬膜外自控镇痛。观察镇痛10 min、镇痛30 min、宫口开全时疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS评分);中转剖宫产率;新生儿1 min和5 min Apgar评分。结果:两组镇痛10 min、镇痛30 min、宫口开全时VAS评分均小于镇痛前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组镇痛10 min、镇痛30 min、宫口开全时VAS评分均小于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组中转剖宫产率显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组新生儿1 min和5 min Apgar评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼双管法用于硬膜外分娩镇痛临床可行。 Objective:To investigate the effectiveness of ropivacaine together with sufentanil in double-catheter epidural analgesia during labor.Method:From January 2013 to January 2014, 200 patients were divived into control group and experimental group,each of 100 cases.The control group were treated by single-catheter epidural analgesia and the experimental group were treated by double-catheter epidural analgesia.Visual analogue scales after ten minutes, thirty minutes,and when the uterine neck whole opened; cesarean section rate; apgar score of newborns in 1 minute and 5 minutes, were compared between two groups.Result:Compared the VAS after ten minutes, thirty minutes and when the uterine neck whole opened between two groups, the differences were statistically significant(P〈0.05).Cesarean section rate in experimental group was significantly lower than that in control group, the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05).Compared the Apgar score of newborns in 1 minute and 5 minutes between two groups, the difference was no statistically significant(P〉0.05).Conclusion:Ropivacaine together with sufentanil were feasible in double-catheter epidural analgesia during labor.
出处 《中国医学创新》 CAS 2014年第35期33-36,共4页 Medical Innovation of China
基金 东莞市医疗卫生科技计划一般项目(2014105101090)
关键词 罗哌卡因 舒芬太尼 双管法 硬膜外分娩镇痛 Ropivacaine Sufentanil Double-catheter Epidural analgesia during labor
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献27

  • 1耿志宇,吴新民,陆辉,张红芹,李昆鹏,刘石磊.产妇分娩时舒芬太尼或芬太尼混合罗哌卡因病人自控硬膜外镇痛的效应[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(8):677-680. 被引量:26
  • 2Conoll-Price J,Evans JB,Hong D,et al.The development and validation of a dynamic model to account for the progress of labor in the assessment of pain[J].Anesth Analg,2008,108(5):1509-1515.
  • 3Jacobson P,Turnor L.Management of the second stage of labor in women with epidural analgesia[J].J Midwifery womens Health,2008,53(1):82-85.
  • 4Minty RG,Kelly L.Minty A,et al.Single-dose intrathecal analgesia to control labour pain:is it a useful alternstive to epidural analgesia[J].Can Fam physician,2007,53(3):437-442.
  • 5Nelson KE,Rsuch T,Terebuth V,et al.A comparison of intrathecal fentanyl and sufentanil for labor anslgesia[J].Anesthesiolgy,2002,98(5):1070-1073.
  • 6Akerman N,Dresner M.The management of breakthrough pain during labour.CNS Drugs,2009,23:669-679.
  • 7Hess PE,Pratt SD,Lucas TP,et al.Predictors of breakthrough pain during labor epidural analgesia.Anesth Analg,2001,93:414-418.
  • 8Traynor JD,Dooley SL,Seyb S.Is the management of epidural associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery ? Am J Obstet Gynecol,2000,182:1058-1062.
  • 9Bernard JM,Le Roux D,Vizquel L,et al.Patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor:the effects of the increase in bolus and lockout interval.Anesth Analg,2000,90:328-332.
  • 10Fischer C,Blanié P,Jaou(e)n E,et al.Ropivacaine,0.1%,plus sufentanil,0.5 microg/ml,versus bupivacaine,0.1%,plus sufentanil,0.5 microg/ml,using patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor:a double-blind comparison.Anesthesiology,2000,92:1588-1593.

共引文献101

同被引文献34

  • 1黄璘,安刚.产科麻醉实用指南[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(3):214-215. 被引量:5
  • 2Feng S W,Xu S Q,Ma L,et al.Regular intermittent bolus provides similar incidence of maternal fever compared with continuous infusion during epidural labor analgesia[J].Saudi Med J,2014,35(10):1237-1242.
  • 3Herrera-Gómez A,García-Marítnez O,Ramos-Torrecillas J,et al.Retrospective study of the association between epidural analgesia during labour and complications for the newborn[J].Midwifery,2015,31(6):613-616.
  • 4Vaida S,Cattano D,Hurwitz D,et al.Algorithm for the anesthetic management of cesarean delivery in patients with unsatisfactory laborepidural analgesia[J].F1000Res,2015,52(4):98.
  • 5Lovach-Chepujnoska M,Nojkov J,Joshevska-Jovanovska S,et al.Continuous versus patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labour analgesia and their effects on maternal motor function and ambulation[J].Prilozi,2014,35(2):76-84.
  • 6Karhade S S,Sardesai S P.0.2%ropivacaine with fentanyl in the management of labor analgesia:A case study of 30 parturients[J].Anesth Essays Res,2015,9(1):83-87.
  • 7Patkar C S,Vora K,Patel H,et al.A comparison of continuous infusion and intermittent bolus administration of 0.1%ropivacaine with 0.0002%fentanyl for epidural labor analgesia[J].J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol,2015,31(2):234-238.
  • 8Sultan P,Murphy C,Halpern S,et al.The effect of low concentrations versus high concentrations of local anesthetics for labour analgesia on obstetric and anesthetic outcomes:a metaanalysis[J].Can J Anaesth,2013,60(9):840-854.
  • 9Kim J W,Kim Y H,Cho H Y,et al.The effect of inflatable obstetric belts in nulliparous pregnant women receiving patientcontrolled epidural analgesia during the second stage of labor[J].J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2013,26(16):1623-1627.
  • 10陈朝辉,向太,高勤,刘洋,李军祥,万勇,杨小霖,陈斌.罗哌卡因混合舒芬太尼用于剖宫产术患者腰麻的半数有效剂量[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2011,31(5):583-585. 被引量:26

引证文献2

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部