期刊文献+

反转时间对流动敏感性交互反转恢复序列脊柱骨髓灌注成像的影响 被引量:1

Effect of inversion time on flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery perfusion imaging of spinal bone marrow
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨反转时间(TI)对流动敏感性交互反转恢复(FAIR)序列脊柱骨髓灌注成像的影响,并评价该技术测量脊柱骨髓血流量(BF)的可重复性.方法 前瞻性收集24名经临床和腰椎MRI检查除外全身疾病和腰椎病变的健康志愿者进行观察.前14名志愿者行脊柱骨髓FAIR序列TI值优化研究,后10名志愿者行脊柱骨髓BF的可重复性研究.14名健康志愿者从L1~ L5椎体内选取2个相邻椎体行横断而FAIR扫描,TI值分别为800、1 000、1 200、1 400、1 600 ms,计算不同TI时椎体骨髓灌注的信号强度变化值(△M)和信噪比(SNR).10名健康志愿者选取L4或L5椎体行2次FAIR序列扫描,参数相同(TI值为1 200 ms),测量同一椎体前后2次FAIR扫描生成的BF值,并采用配对t检验及重复性分析评价2次测量的可重复性.结果 14名志愿者采用FAIR序列共扫描28个椎体,TI值分别为800、1 000、1 200、1 400、1 600 ms时,△M值分别为20.8±9.0、29.0± 10.9、36.4± 12.5、26.2±10.2和23.8±11.5,SNR分别为2.0±1.0、2.3±0.8、2.4±1.0、2.3±0.8和2.0±0.7,脊柱骨髓灌注△M值及SNR值,随TI值升高而呈现先升高后下降的趋势,TI为1 200 ms时达到高峰.10名志愿者前后2次扫描所得的椎体骨髓灌注的血流量BF值分别为(108.9±4.6)和(109.2±4.6)ml·10Og-1·min-1,差异无统计学意义(t=-0.157,P=0.879).前后2次扫描间个体间变异系数wCV为3.28%(3.57/109.06),可重复性良好.结论 TI值为1 200 ms时,脊柱椎体骨髓△M最大,灌注图像SNR最高,测量脊柱骨髓BF的可重复性好. Objective To investigate the effect of inversion time (TI) on flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) perfusion imaging of spinal bone marrow (SBM),and evaluate the reproducibility of blood flow (BF) measurements using this technique.Methods Twenty four healthy volunteers without lumbar and other disease with clinical and MR studies were prospectively included.The first 14 healthy volunteers were included to study the effect of TI on ASL perfusion imaging of SBM to get the optimized TI,the remaining 10 volunteers were included to investigate the reproducibility of the SBM arterial spin labeling (ASL) scan protocol.The optimized TI of FAIR spinal bone marrow perfusion experiment was carried out on 14 healthy volunteers on 3.0 T magnet,two adjacent vertebral bodies were orderly selected from each volunteer to measure the △M and the SNR of FAIR perfusion MRI with 5 different TIs (800,1 000,1 200,1 400,1 600 ms),and the vertebral bodies selected order were determined by the order of the subjects enrolled.In addition,FAIR perfusion spinal vertebral BF measurements were repeated in last l0 healthy subjects on L4 or L5 by reposition immediately,paired t test and reproducibility statistics (included within-patient standard deviation (wSD) and within-patient coefficient of variation (WCV)) were used to analyze the test-retest experiment reproducibility.Result TI optimization experiments total included 28 vertebral bodies,when TI (ms) was chose as 800,1 000,1 200,1 400,1 600,ms respectively,the mean △M of spinal bone marrow were 20.8±9.0,29.0± 10.9,36.4± 12.5,26.2± 10.2 and 23.8± 11.5,and the mean SNR were 2.0± 1.0,2.3±0.8,2.4± 1.0,2.3±0.8 and 2.0±0.7.With TI increasing,AM and SNR increased first and then decrcascd,the maximum values of both were achieved when the TI near 1 200 ms.Test-retestexperimcnt were carried on 10 vertebral bodies eventually,and two measurements of spinal vertebral BF perfusion before and after were (108.9±4.6)and (109.2 ±4.6)ml · 100g-1· min 1,respectively,and no significant difference was found (t=-0.157,P=0.879),wCV of the measurements was 3.28% (3.57/109.06).Conclusion The optimal TI was 1 200 ms for spinal bone marrow ASL perfusion image,at which the maximum AM,higher SNR,and good reproducibility for the FAIR spinal bone marrow perfusion imaging can be achieved.
出处 《中华放射学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第12期1009-1012,共4页 Chinese Journal of Radiology
基金 湖北省自然科学基金(2013CFB242) 湖北省卫生厅科研项目(JX6B68)
关键词 磁共振成像 灌注 脊柱 骨髓 Magnetic resonance imaging Perfusion Spinal Bone marrow
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Martirosian P,Boss A,Schraml C,et al.Magnetic resonance perfusion imaging without contrast media[J].Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging,2010,37 Suppl 1:S52-S64.
  • 2Wu WC,Su MY,Chang CC,et al.Renal perfusion 3-T MR imaging:a comparative study of arterial spin labeling and dynamic contrast-enhanced techniques[J].Radiology,2011,261:845-853.
  • 3Petersen ET,Zimine I,Ho YC,et al.Non-invasive measurement of perfusion:a critical review of arterial spin labelling techniques[J].Br J Radiol,2006,79:688-701.
  • 4Fenchel M,Konaktchieva M,Weisel K,et al.Response assessment in patients with multiple myeloma during antiangiogenic therapy using arterial spin labeling and diffusion-weighted imaging:a feasibility study[J].Acad Radiol,2010,17:1326-1333.
  • 5常飞燕,谢晟,李中实,刘卉,王武.利用三维伪连续脉冲动脉自旋标记测量颈性眩晕相关的脑血流量改变的初步研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2014,48(1):25-28. 被引量:18
  • 6Hendrikse J,van Osch M J,Rutgers DR,et al.Internal carotid artery occlusion assessed at pulsed arterial spin-labeling perfusion MR imaging at multiple delay times[J].Radiology,2004,233:899-904.
  • 7Spira D,K(o)tter I,Henes J,et al.MRI findings in psoriatic arthritis of the hands[J].AJR Am J Roentgenol,2010,195:1187-1193.
  • 8Andreisek G,White LM,Sussman MS,et al.T2*-weighted and arterial spin labeling MRI of calf muscles in healthy volunteers and patients with chronic exertional compartment syndrome:preliminary experience[J].AJR Am J Roentgenol,2009,193:W327-W333.
  • 9Fenchel M,Konaktchieva M,Weisel K,et al.Early response assessment in patients with multiple myeloma during anti-angiogenic therapy using arterial spin labelling:first clinical results[J].Eur Radiol,2010,20:2899-2906.
  • 10Boss A,Martirosian P,Fritz J,et al.Magnetic resonance spin-labeling perfusion imaging of synovitis in inflammatory arthritis at 3.0 T[J].MAGMA,2009,22:175-180.

二级参考文献16

共引文献107

同被引文献15

  • 1Lodhi SA, Meier-Kriesche HU. Kidney allograft survival: the long and short of it[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2011, 26(1): 15-17.
  • 2Wu O, Levy AR, Briggs A, et al. Acute rejection and chronic nephropathy: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Transplantation, 2009, 87(9): 1330-1339.
  • 3Jiang SH, Karpe KM, Talaulikar GS. Safety and predictors of complications of renal biopsy in the outpatient setting[J]. Clin Nephrol, 2011, 76(6): 464-469.
  • 4Ferr6 JC, Bannier E, Raoult H, et al. Arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion: techniques and clinical use[J]. Diagn Interv Imaging, 2013, 94(12): 1211-1223.
  • 5Odudu A, Francis ST, McIntyre CW. MRI for the assessment of organ perfusion in patients with chronic kidney disease[J]. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens, 2012, 21(6): 647-654.
  • 6Lanzman RS, Wittsack HJ, Martirosian P, et al. Quantification of renal allograft perfusion using arterial spin labeling MRI: initial results[J]. Eur Radiol, 2010, 20(6): 1485-1491.
  • 7Artz NS, Sadowski EA, Wentland AL, et al. Arterial spin labeling MRI for assessment of perfusion in native and transplanted kidneys[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2011, 29(1): 74- 82.
  • 8Heusch P, Wittsack HJ, Blondin D, et al. Functional evaluation of transplanted kidneys using arterial spin labeling MRI[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2014, 40(1): 84-89.
  • 9Fenchel M, Martirosian P, Langanke J, et al. Perfusion MR imaging with FAIR true FISP spin labeling in patients with and without renal artery stenosis: initial experience[J]. Radiology, 2006, 238(3): 1013-1021.
  • 10National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2002, 39 (2 Suppl 1): S1-S266.

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部