钓鱼岛问题的“战后处理论”话语建构

The Discourse Construction of " To Negotiate After War" in Diaoyu Islands Disputes

"钓鱼岛问题"在中日邦交正常化以来40年间反复发作,形成"固有领土论"、"国际秩序论"等立场对抗僵局。但事实上其作为"问题"应追溯第二次世界大战的战后处理,即只有在"战后处理史"的过程研究中才能洞察"钓鱼岛问题"生成及其危机化原理。基于这种问题意识展开实证研究,发现日本在战后初期曾经暗示承认中国钓鱼岛主权的可能性,但在美日片面议和体制下却虚构了作为外交策略的"固有领土论",并且能够辩驳其对中日"搁置争议共识"的否认,揭示其所谓"已经实效支配论"的欺骗性。以"战后处理论"的知识体系建构"钓鱼岛问题"话语,重整中日关系的历史逻辑,包括日本国民在内的国际社会才容易有逻辑地作出尊重中国的理解,促进问题的合理解决。

The Diaoyu Islands disputes have recurrently broken out in the decades since the normalization of Sino - Japanese diplomatic relations 40 years ago, with the deadlock caused by conflicting positions such as ＂the theory of inherent territory＂ and ＂the theory of international order＂. In fact, the origin of Diaoyu Islands issues should be traced back to the idea of ＂to negotiate after war＂ which emerged at the end of WWII. The historical origin and logics of crisis escalation can be well observed in the perspective of ＂to negotiate after war＂. Based on the empirical research, it can be discovered that Japan used to suggest the possibility of recognizing China＇ s sovereignty over Diaoyu Islands in the early years after the war, but turned to declare the Diaoyu Islands as Japanese inherent territory, as a diplomatic tactics, in the context of unilateral U. S. - Japan reconciliation. With that understanding, Japan＇s denial of Sino - Japanese consensus on shelving disputes on Diaoyu Islands can be justifiably refuted, and the deceptive nature of Japan＇ s position that Diaoyu Islands ＂ have been under the effective administration of Japanese government＂ can be well acknowledged. The discourse relating to Diaoyu Islands should be reconstructed on the basis of knowledge of ＂to negotiate after war＂, so that the international community, including Japanese people, can better understand and respect Chinese position on Diaoyu Islands disputes and help make effort to solve the issues.