期刊文献+

当代英国宪政思潮中的普通法宪政主义 被引量:5

下载PDF
导出
摘要 自19世纪以来,议会至上原则一直是英国宪政实践与理论基石,这在作为英国司法审查之依据的越权无效原则中体现得尤为突出。但越权无效原则存在自身的局限,在对该原则的批判过程中,普通法宪政主义要求将法治而非议会至上原则作为法院司法审查的基础,因为议会同行政一样有可能侵犯个人的自由和权利,而普通法和普通法法院则在保护人权、践行法治精神方面具有议会和行政所不具备的优势。
作者 李红海
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《华东政法大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期129-136,共8页 Ecupl Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1杨伟东.越权原则在英国的命运[J].政法论坛,2000,18(3):109-114. 被引量:6
  • 2何海波.“越权无效”是行政法的基本原则吗?——英国学界一场未息的争论[J].中外法学,2005,17(4):488-500. 被引量:18
  • 3Cited from Christopher Forsyth, "Of Fig Leaves and Fairy Tales: The Ultra Vires Doctrine, the Sovereignty of Parliament and Judicial Re- view", 55 The Cambridge Law Journal, Part One (1996).
  • 4See Thomas Poole, "Back To the Future? Unearthing the Theory of Common Law Constitutionalism" ,23 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 435 (2003).
  • 5See Sir J. Laws, "The Constitution: Morals and Rights", (1996) Public Law 622.
  • 6also his "Judicial Remedies and the Constitution",57 Michigan Law Review 213(1994).
  • 7See Sir J. Laws, "The Constitution: Morals and Rights", ( 1996 ) Public Law 622.
  • 8See D. Oliver, "The Underlying Values of Public Law and Private Law", in M. Taggart ed. , The Province of Administrative Law, Hart Pub- lishing, 1997, pp. 230-231.
  • 9See J. Jowell, "Beyond the Rule of Law: Towards Constitutional Judicial Review", (2000) Public Law 671.
  • 10Sir Matthew Hale, A History of the Common law, 5th edition, Wm Gaunt & Sons, 1993, p. 17.

二级参考文献13

  • 1威廉·韦德.行政法[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1997.365.
  • 2[美]杰罗姆·巴伦 托马斯·迪恩斯 刘瑞祥 译.美国宪法概论[M].中国社会科学院出版社,1995.105.
  • 3Paul Craig: Ultra Vires and the FOundati of Judlcial Review, The Cambridge Law Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7, Part One, March, 1998[J].
  • 4Mark Elliott : The Denlise of Parlianlentary Sovereignty.Th Law Quarterly Review, Sweet & Maxwell, London, Vol. 115, No. 1. January 1999 [J].
  • 5Sir John Laws,,The Ghost in the Marchine:Prinicipie in Public Law,Public Law, 1989[J].
  • 6龚样瑞.比较宪法与行政法[M].北京:法律出版社,1985.
  • 7Mark Elliot:The Ultra Vires Doctrine in a Consti tutional Setting:Still the Central Prineinple of Ad ministrative Law, The Cambridge Law Journal Cambridge University Press, Vol. 58, Part One March 1999[J].
  • 8Christopher Forsyth: Of Fig Leaves and Fairy Tales: the Ultra Vires Doctrine, the Sovereignty of Parliament and Judicial Review, The Cambridge Law Journal, Cabridge University Press, Vol 55,Part One,March 1996[J].
  • 9Christopher Forsyth: Of Fig Leaves and Fairy Tales: The Ultra Vires Doctrine, the Sovereignty of Parliament and Judicail Reveiew, The Cambridge Law Journal ,Cambridge University" Press, Vol. 55, Part One.March 1996.
  • 10T. R. S Allan: Legislative Supremacy and the Rule Of Law: Democracy and Constitutionalism,The Cambridge Law Journal, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 44. Part One. March 1985.

同被引文献59

引证文献5

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部