期刊文献+

学术职业资历惩罚理论的中国解释——教师流动对于NRS模型的贡献分析 被引量:2

The Chinese Explanation for Negative Returns to Seniority in Academic Profession:Analysis of the Contribution of Faculty Mobility to NRS Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过系统梳理文献构建中国学术职业资历惩罚(NRS)的基础假设,采用针对中国11所研究型大学的学术职业调查数据库,以教师流动特征作为NRS解释的关键变量,对流动次数、流动类型两类流动特征变量与NRS的关系进行了实证检验。实证研究发现,中国客观存在NRS现象,中国大学教师资历与流动的关系、资历与收入的关系也与西方假设相一致。随着高等教育的进一步发展,中国学术职业中NRS现象会继续加大,大学应科学分析NRS现象利弊,通过促进和规范教师流动有效引导学术职业健康发展。 Based on a systematic review of the previous research findings, the author puts forward basic hypotheses for Chinese NRS study. He then conducts an empirical study on the relationship between the frequency and type of faculty mobility and NRS based on a database of eleven research universities in China. The study reveals that the phenomenon of NRS exists in China and that the relationship between faculty's seniority and mobility and the relationship between faculty's seniority and income coincide with the mainstream Western theoretical explanations. With the further development of higher education, the NRS phenomenon of academic profession in China will continue to increase. Therefore, the pros and cons of NRS should be analyzed scientifically, and faculty mobility should be promoted and regulated to guide the sound development of academic profession.
作者 刘进
出处 《复旦教育论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期63-68,共6页 Fudan Education Forum
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71273101)
关键词 资历惩罚 大学教师流动 研究型大学 学术劳动力市场 Negative Returns to Seniority Faculty Mobility Research University Academic Labor Market
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1RANSOM M R. Seniority and Monopsony in the Academic Labor Market[J]. Amercian Economic Review, 1993, 83(1): 221 -233.
  • 2HALLOCK K. Seniority and Monopsony in the Academic Labor Market: Comment [J]. American Economic Review, 1995,85 (3): 654 - 657.
  • 3BARBEZAT D A, DONIHUE M R. Do Faeuhy Salaries Rise with Job Seniority[J]. Economics Letters, 1998, 58(2): 239 - 244.
  • 4MOORE W J, NEWMAN R J, TURNBULL G K. Do Facuhy Salaries Decline with Seniority [J]. Journal of Labor Economics, 1998, 16(2): 352 - 366.
  • 5BRATSBERG B, RAGAN J F, WARREN J T. Negative Returns to Seniority: New Evidence in Academic Markets [J]. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 2003, 56(2): 306 - 323.
  • 6BOAL W, RANSOM M. Monopsnny in the Labor Market [J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 1997, 35(1): 86- 112.
  • 7EHRENBERG R G, P1EPER P J, WILLIS R A. Do Economies Departments with Lower Tenure Probabilities Pay Higher Facuhy Salaries [J]. Review of Economics and Statisties, 1998, 80 (4): 503 - 512.
  • 8MONKS J, ROBINSON M. The Returns to Seniority in Academic Labor Markets[J]. Journal of Labor Research, 2001, 22(2): 415 - 426.
  • 9BRATSBERG B, RAGAN J F, WARREN J T. Does Raiding Explain The Negative Returns To Faculty Seniority [J]. Economic Inquiry, 2010, 48(3): 704 - 721.
  • 10BROWN D. The Mobile Professors [D]. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1967.

同被引文献16

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部