摘要
司法实践中,因事实认定上的困难所导致的"疑罪"难以避免,究竟是采用"疑罪从无",还是"疑罪从轻",不能一概而论,"疑罪"的认定必须与犯罪构成结合起来予以判定。在此前提下的"从无"还是"从轻",需要根据已有案件事实究竟能否充足犯罪构成要件内容进行具体评判。如果基本犯罪构成要件内容无法满足,则理当疑罪从无;如果基本犯罪构成要件已经充足,只是就重罪或轻罪、一罪或数罪、重刑或轻刑存有争议,则理当疑罪从轻。结合刑法基础理论对案件事实进行仔细甄别,是正确进行性质认定和刑罚裁量的关键与前提。
There are lots of questionable crimes resulting from the difficulty of fact cognizance, thus the choice between the innocence and mitigation cannot be confirmed without exception. The judgment of questionable crimes must be related with crime constitution, by which the innocence or mitigation shall be viewed: if the facts cannot be accorded with the crime constitution, thus the criminal is innocent; if the basic constitution elements are fulfilled, and there are some disputes on felony or misdemeanor, one crime or multi-crimes, severe or mitigating penalty, we shall mitigate its penalty. It is the key and precondition for us to judge the crime nature and penalty degree according to the facts connected with criminal law and its theoretical doctrine.
出处
《河南大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第1期21-26,共6页
Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences)
关键词
疑罪从无
疑罪从轻
交通肇事
司法定性
innocence of questionable crimes
mitigation of questionable crimes
traffic accident
judicial judgment