期刊文献+

不同术式阑尾切除术后切口感染的对比分析一项大型多中心回顾性研究 被引量:19

Wound infection after emergency appendectomy by open vs laparoscopic approach: a multicenter retrospective large cohort study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨腹腔镜阑尾切除手术(laparoscopic appendectomy,LA)后常见并发症切口感染的发生情况.方法 回顾性分析2011-2013年华东地区6家县市级医院所有急性阑尾炎手术患者的临床资料,对LA和开腹阑尾切除术(open appendectomy,OA)后的结果进行对比,并对所有阑尾切除术后导致切口感染的危险因素进行多因素回归分析.结果 9 340例患者中行LA阑尾切除术1 831例(19.6%),开腹阑尾切除术7 509例(80.4%);3年间LA手术开展的比例分别为9.2%、15.0%及32.9%.所有阑尾切除患者的术后切口感染并发症发生率为5.1%,其中LA为2.1%,OA为5.8%,两者差异有统计学意义(x2 =41.22,P<0.01);3年间LA术后切口感染并发症发生率分别为5.6%、4.4%及3.5%,呈逐年下降趋势(x2=31.59,P<0.01).多因素回归分析证实,不同手术方式是导致阑尾切除术后并发切口感染的一项独立影响因素(优势比1.37,95%可信区间1.12 ~1.63,P =0.02).结论 LA阑尾切除术后切口感染的发生率逐年下降,LA手术是阑尾切除术后并发切口感染的独立保护因素. Objective Emergency laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has been rapidly applied at county-level hospitals in China.This study is to analyze wound infection after appendectomy.Methods This retrospective study was conducted among patients with acute appendicitis undergoing either laparoscopic or open appendectomy (OA) at 6 county-level general hospitals in Eastern China from 2011 to 2013,using multivariate Logistic regression model to assess independent risk factors associated with wound infection.Results Among 9 340 patients,1 831 (19.6%) and 7 509 (80.4%) patients underwent LA and OA respectively.The overall postoperative wound infection rate was 5.1%.The proportion of LAs increased yearly from 9.2% to 15.0% to 32.9%,while the LA postoperative wound infection rate decreased from 5.6% to 4.4% to 3.5% (P < 0.05).Compared with OA,LA was associated with lower wound infection rate after appendectomy (2.1% vs.5.8%,P < 0.01).By multivariate logistic regression analysis,various procedure was found to be independently associated with postoperative wound infection [odds ratio (95% confidence interval) OR (95% CI),1.37 (1.12-1.63); P =0.02].Conclusions Laparoscopic appendectomy carries a decreasing postoperative wound infection rate by year basis.Laparoscopic procedure was independently associated with a significantly lower incidence of wound infection after appendectomy.
出处 《中华普通外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第12期954-957,共4页 Chinese Journal of General Surgery
关键词 阑尾切除术 手术后并发症 感染 腹腔镜 Appendectomy Postoperative complications Infection Laparoscopes
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献9

共引文献10

同被引文献155

  • 1廖泽飞,陈一杰,吴淼,张诚华,姚清勇,张少波,董少良,林荣凯.腹部手术后切口感染的原因分析[J].临床军医杂志,2007,35(2):219-221. 被引量:30
  • 2Worni M, Ostbye T, Gandhi M, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy outcomes on the weekend and during the week are no different: a national study of 151,774 patients [ J ]. World J Surg, 2012,36 (7) :1527-1533.
  • 3Moazzez A, Mason RJ, Katkhouda N. Thirty-day outcomes of lapa- roscopic versus open appendectomy in elderly using ACS/NSQIP database[ J]. Surg Endosc ,2013,27 (4) : 1061-1071.
  • 4Yeh CC, Wu SC, Liao CC, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis is more favorable for patients with comorbidi- ties, the elderly, and those with complicated appendicitis: a na- tionwide population-based study [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2011,25 ( 9 ) : 2932-2942.
  • 5Wang CC, Tu CC, Wang PC, et al. Outcome comparison between laparoscopic and open appendectomy: evidence from a nationwide population-based study [ J ]. PLoS One,2013,8 (7) : e68662.
  • 6李景春,宋立伟,王彩平.预防穿孔性阑尾炎切口感染的两点改进[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2008,15(1):26-26. 被引量:27
  • 7Saber AA, Elgamal MI-I, E1-Ghazaly TH, et al. Simple technique for single incision transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy[J]. Int J Surg,2010, 8(2) : 128-130.
  • 8Blatnik JA, Krpata DM, Novitsky YW, et al. Does a history of wound in- fection predict postoperative surgical site infection after ventral hernia re- pair?[J]. Am J Surg, 2012,203 (3) : 370-374.
  • 9Chiang RA, Chen SL,Tsai YC, et al. Comparison of primary wound closure versus open wound management in perforated appendicitis[J]. J Formos Med Assoc, 2006,105 (10) : 791-795.
  • 10孙桂彬,杨景国,孔繁艳.预防阑尾炎切口感染的临床分析[J].白求恩军医学院学报,2008,6(4):212-213. 被引量:17

引证文献19

二级引证文献183

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部