期刊文献+

众包竞赛模式下企业R&D创新水平策略博弈分析 被引量:9

The game analysis of enterprises' R&D innovation strategyunder crowdsourcing contest mode
原文传递
导出
摘要 企业R&D创新需要有效利用内外部创新资源,基于众包竞赛模式的企业R&D创新能够充分挖掘和激发大众的创新智慧,助力企业R&D创新,已受到企业界的广泛重视。考虑R&D创新模式溢出效应的不同情况下,针对企业创新模式及其投入策略选择,以及众包竞赛模式下企业间完全竞争和合作时的决策问题,建立了相应的博弈模型,分析了企业的决策对R&D创新水平的影响。研究表明:较仅依靠内部资源的R&D创新(A策略)收益,企业通过设置合理的奖金并结合内部创新和众包竞赛模式(B策略)是占优策略;B策略下,企业间处于完全竞争或合作的状态时,溢出效应的不同对众包竞赛模式创新能力的贡献度造成了影响;此外,企业收益、R&D创新水平、消费者剩余及社会福利均与众包竞赛模式的贡献度正相关。最后以宝洁公司采用B策略对R&D进行创新的案例验证了相关结论。 The enterprises' R&D innovation require effective use of internal and external resources.As a new mode of innovation,crowdsourcing contest has drawn a widely public attention due to its full use of the public's intelligence for enterprises' R&D innovation.Considering the existence of spillover effects,we developed a game model to analyze the optimal innovation mode and investment policy of enterprises.When crowdsourcing contest is selected,we further discussed the corresponding decisions if the relationship between enterprises is competitive or cooperative,and analyzed the influence of these decisions on R&D innovation.The results showed that,when a reasonable bonus was set,the strategy that combining use of internal innovation and crowdsourcing contest innovation(B strategy) was better than that solely relying on the internal innovation(A strategy).Given B strategy,different spillover effects would affect the level of R&D innovation of crowdsourcing contest mode,under both competition and cooperation situation.Meanwhile,the contribution of the crowdsourcing contest was positively related to many factors,including enterprise income,the level of R&D innovation,consumer surplus and social welfare.Finally,a case of P&G Company is used to verify the corresponding conclusions of the paper.
出处 《科研管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期111-120,共10页 Science Research Management
基金 国家自然基金资助项目(71071080)
关键词 众包竞赛 R&D创新 溢出效应 博弈分析 crowdsourcing contest R&D innovation spillover effects game analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1刘卫民,陈继祥.内生溢出与R&D竞争、合作的激励问题[J].管理工程学报,2006,20(3):1-5. 被引量:25
  • 2Czarnttzki D., Ebersberger Band FierI A..The relationship between R&D collaboration, subsidies and R&D performance:empirical evidence from finland and germany[J]..Journal of Applied Econometrics.2007, 22:1347-1366.
  • 3González X., Jaumandreu J.and PazóReviewed C.Barriers to innovation and subsidy effectiveness[J].The RAND Journal of Economics, 2005, Vol.36, No.4 pp.930-950.
  • 4赵丹,王宗军.消费者剩余、技术许可选择与双边政府R&D补贴[J].科研管理,2012,33(2):88-96. 被引量:7
  • 5Estellés-Arolas, E.& González Ladrón-de-Guevara, FTowards an integrated crowdsourcing definition[J]..Journal of Information Science.2012, 38(2):189-200.
  • 6DAspremont C, Jacquemin A.Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers[J].American Economic Review, 1988, 78(5):1133-1137.
  • 7Cassiman B., Veugelers R.R&D Cooperation and Spillovers:Some Empirical Evidence from Belgium[J].The American Economic Review, 2002, Vol.92, No.4 pp.1169-1184.
  • 8Piga C., Theotoky JP.Endogenous R&D spillovers and locational choice[J]..Regional Science and Urban Economics.2005, 35:127-139.
  • 9Miyagiwa K, Ohno Y.Uncertainty, spillovers, and cooperative R&D[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization.2002, 20:855-875.
  • 10Terwiesch, C., Xu, YInnovation contests, open innovation, andmultiagent problem solving[J]..Management Sci.2008, 54(9):1529-1543.

二级参考文献31

  • 1许春,刘奕.技术溢出与企业研发政府补贴政策的相机选择[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005,26(1):25-30. 被引量:28
  • 2张洪石,付玉秀.影响突破性创新的环境因素分析和实证研究[J].科学学研究,2005,23(B12):255-263. 被引量:37
  • 3侯光明,艾凤义.基于混合溢出的双寡头横向R&D合作[J].管理工程学报,2006,20(4):94-97. 被引量:57
  • 4Damanpour F.,Walker R.M.,Avellaneda C.N..Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performance: A longitudinal study of service organizations[J].Journal of Management Studies,2009,46(4): 650-675.
  • 5Christensen C.M..The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail[M].Boston,MA: Harvard Business School Press,1997.
  • 6McDermott C.M.,O’Connor G.C..Managing radical innovation: An overview of emergent strategy issues[J].The Journal of Product Innovation Management,2002,19: 424-438.
  • 7Danneels E..Disruptive technology reconsidered: A critique and research agenda[J].The Journal of Product Innovation Management,2004,21(4): 246-258.
  • 8Laukkanen P.H.,Sainino L.M.,Jauhiainen T..Appropriability regime for radical and incremental innovations[J].R&D Management,2008,38(3): 278-289.
  • 9Sandberg B..Customer-related proactiveness in the radical innovation development process[J].European Journal of Innovation Management,2007,10(2): 252-267.
  • 10Katsoulacos Y.,Ulph D..Endogenous spillovers and the performance of research joint ventures[J].The Journal of Industrial Economics,1998,46(3): 333-357.

共引文献42

同被引文献134

引证文献9

二级引证文献93

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部