期刊文献+

模糊与澄清:上游补贴利益传递分析的法律依据探析——以GATT/WTO裁决为样本 被引量:7

Indistinction and Clarification: Legal Basis for the Benefit Pass-through Analysis of Upstream Subsidy with GATT / WTO Awards as Samples
原文传递
导出
摘要 利益接受者概念的提出及与补贴获得者的分裂,为逆向回溯上游补贴利益传递分析的法律依据提供了基点和场域。由于在SCM协定第五部分(反补贴措施)中不可或缺的利益传递分析,在SCM协定第三部分(可诉性补贴)中仅是判断严重侵害因果关联的考虑要素之一,并在SCM协定第二部分(禁止性补贴)中几无必要,WTO框架下实施利益传递分析的法律依据,是与SCM协定第五部分紧密相关的GATT1994第6条第3款及其派生条款。 The raising of benefit recipient concept and the dividing of subsidy winners provide the legal basis and field for reversing back the legal basis for the benefit pass- through analysis of upstream subsidy. Due to the fact that the indispensable benefit pass- through analysis in Part V of SCM Agreement (countervailing measures) is only one of the major factors for the causal relation of serious prejudice in Part III of SCM Agreement (actionable subsidies), and is almost unnecessary in Part II of SCM Agreement (prohibitive subsidies), the legal basis for the benefit pass-through analysis under SCM Agreement is Article VI:3 GATT 1994 and its derivative rules.
作者 李仲平
出处 《国际经贸探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期101-114,共14页 International Economics and Trade Research
基金 2012年国家社科基金一般项目(12BFX139) 上海财经大学2012研究生创新基金资助项目(CXJJ-2012-307)
关键词 上游补贴 利益传递 法律依据 WTO GATT upstream subsidy benefit pass-through legal basis WTO GATT
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献41

共引文献14

同被引文献90

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部