期刊文献+

公平感知、关系质量与研发合作关系价值研究 被引量:26

Research on fairness perception,relationship quality and R&D cooperative relationship value
原文传递
导出
摘要 以关系质量为中介变量,利用结构方程模型和上海汽车行业研发合作的198份样本数据,实证研究了研发合作中公平感知对关系价值的影响。结果发现:程序公平和互动公平通过满意影响了关系价值,并且程序公平的影响小,互动公平的影响大,分配公平通过承诺影响了关系价值;同时发现,满意对关系价值的影响最大,其次是信任、承诺。 In this paper,the impacts of fairness perceptions to relationship values in RD cooperation are argued with intervening variableof relationship quality and by the application of structural equation model and by use of 198 sample data from Shanghai automobile industrial RD cooperative relationships. It is found out that the procedure fairness and interaction fairness have an impact on relationship values through satisfaction,and influences of procedure fairness are less,influences of interaction fairness are more. And the influences of distribution fairness on relationship values are achieved through commitment path. Also,the influences of satisfaction to relationship values are maximizing,the second is trust,and the third is commitment.
作者 刘刚 王岚
出处 《科研管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第8期25-33,共9页 Science Research Management
基金 教育部人文社会科学规划基金资助项目(10YJA790112)。起止时间:2011.1-2013.12
关键词 公平感知 关系质量 关系价值 研发合作 fairness perception relationship quality relationship value R&D cooperative
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1N. Kumar, L. K. Scheer, JBE. M. Steenkamp. The effects of supplier fairness on vulnerable reseUers [ J ]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1995, 32( 1 ) :54 -65.
  • 2V. Kashyap, E. Sivadas. An exploratory examination of shared values in channel relationships [ J ]. Journal of Busi- ness Research, 2012, (65) : 586 -593.
  • 3J. A. Colquitt. On the dimensionality of organizational jus- tice : A construct validation of a measure [ J ] Journal of Ap- plied Psychology, 2001, (86) : 386 -400.
  • 4刘亚,龙立荣,李晔.组织公平感对组织效果变量的影响[J].管理世界,2003,19(3):126-132. 被引量:311
  • 5L. A. Crosby, K. R. Evans, D. Cowles. Relationship qual- ity in services selling: an interpersonal influence perspective [J]. Journal of Marketing, 1990, 54(3) : 68 -81.
  • 6M. Holmlund. The D&D model dimensions and domains of relationship quality perceptions [ J]. Service Industries Jour- nal, 2001,21(3) : 13 -36.
  • 7J. Mohr, R. Spekman. Characteristics of partnership suc- cess: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1994, 15(2): 135-152.
  • 8K. Storbacka, T. Strandvik, C. Gr nroos. Managing custom- er relationships for profit: The dynamics of relationship quality[J]. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 1994, 5(5) : 21 -38.
  • 9J. A. Young. Strategic alliances: Are they relational by defi- nition [ R]. Indiana State University Working Paper, 2000.
  • 10武志伟,陈莹.企业间关系质量的测度与绩效分析——基于近关系理论的研究[J].预测,2007,26(2):8-13. 被引量:35

二级参考文献33

  • 1武志伟,茅宁,陈莹.企业间合作绩效影响机制的实证研究——基于148家国内企业的分析[J].管理世界,2005,21(9):99-106. 被引量:57
  • 2Colquitt, J.A., "On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure", Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001,86 : 386-400.
  • 3Colquitt, J.A. , Conlon, D.E. , Wesson, M.J. , Porter,C.O.L.H. ,& Ng,K.Y. ,"Justice at the millennium: A metaanalytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research",Journa of Applied Psychology, 2001,86 : 425-445.
  • 4Albertlai, & Hwang Kwangkuo, "Procedural justice and distributive juetice: justice perceptions and work attitudes among business employees in Taiwan", Chinese Journal of Psychology, 2000, 42: (2) : 171-190.
  • 5Farh, J.L. , Earley, P. C. , & Lin, S. C. , "Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society", Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42: 421-444.
  • 6Yang, G. S., Social Orientation of Chinese: A Social interactional perspective. In G. S. Yang, & A. B. Yu(ed), The mind and behavior of Chinese:Theory and methodology,Taipei :Guiguan Press, 1993, 87-141.
  • 7Leventhal, G.S. ,Karuza,J. , & Fry, W.R. ,Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences, In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction, NY: Springer-Verlag,1980,187--218.
  • 8Sweeney, P. D., & McFarlin, D. B. , Workers evaluation of the ends and the means: An examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1993,55,23-40.
  • 9Bies, R.J. , & Moag, J. S., (1986), Interactional justice: Communication criteria of falrness. In R.J.Lewicki,B. H. Sheppard, M. H. Bazerman(Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations,pp43-55.Greenwhch, CT: JAL.
  • 10Colon, D.E. , "Some tests of the self-interest and group value models of procedural justice: Evidence from an organizational appeal procedure", Academy of Management Journal, 1993, 36, 1109-1124.

共引文献344

同被引文献392

引证文献26

二级引证文献121

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部