公私协力法律关系之双阶争讼困境

Two-level Adversarial Dilemma of Public-private Partnership Legal Relationship

双阶理论下前后阶段行为之关连及互相影响,学说上的四种可能主张都不足以达成高度之共识。籍助民法上无因性理论,后阶段契约瑕疵和前阶段行政处分瑕疵非同一性理论可以被用来解释前后阶段法律行为效力之独立判断。台湾地区目前关于规范公私协力法律关系"采购法"或"促参法"之解释,立法者对于前后阶段行为效力之关系,采用双阶理论,导致实体法律关系割裂,救济程序陷于困境。而德国采购法新制在采购法程序上稳健线状突破的操作方法,值得参考。

Considering the connection and mutual influence of the behaviors in the two phases under the two-level theory, none of the four possible theoretic arguments can reach a high degree of consensus. Lending the non-causation theory in civil law, the non-identity theory of contract lfaws in the later phase and administrative sanction lfaws in the former phase can be used to explain the independent judgment of legal behaviors’ effect in the two phases. Currently in Taiwan Region, as for regulating the interpretation of the public-private partnership ‘procurement law’ and ‘private participation promotion law’, the two-level theory is adopted by the legislation to explain the relationship between behaviors’ effect in the two phases, leading to the isolation of substantive legal relationship and the dilemma of relief procedure. Oppositely, the stable linear breakthrough way used in the new procurement law in Germany worth considering.