期刊文献+

应用改良版英国医学研究委员会呼吸问卷、自我评估测试问卷和临床问卷评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者健康状况的比较研究 被引量:53

Comparison of applications of m MRC,CAT and CCQ questionnaire in assessment of the health status of patients with COPD
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较改良版英国医学研究委员会呼吸问卷(m MRC)、自我评估测试问卷(CAT)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)临床问卷(CCQ)三种量表评估COPD患者的健康状况以及相互关系。方法 60例COPD患者分别应用三种量表进行调查,评估问卷得分,记录填写问卷所需时间及完成问卷是否需要医务人员帮助,并对三种量表评分进行相关性分析。结果三种问卷相互之间呈正相关(CAT与m MRC之间rs=0.65;CCQ与m MRC之间rs=0.59;CAT与CCQ之间rs=0.69,均P<0.01);患者完成问卷时间,m MRC为(102±56)秒,CAT为(187±64)秒,CCQ为(234±105)秒;m MRC、CAT和CCQ分别有42.6%、53.9%、68.5%的患者需要医务人员协助完成问卷。结论 m MRC、CAT和CCQ之间有良好相关性,能可靠、有效和敏感地反映COPD患者健康状况与生活质量。 Objective To compare the applications of Modified Version of the British Medical Research Council Respiratory Questionnaire(mMRC),Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Self-assessment Questionnaire Test(CAT) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Clinical Questionnaire( CCQ) in assessment of the health status of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary dis-ease(COPD).Methods Sixty patients with COPD were tested with mMRC,CAT and CCQ questionnaire,respectively.The total scores,the time taken to complete the questionnaires and whether they needed the help of medical staff during the investigation were re-corded and their relationships were analyzed.Results Spearman correlation analysis showed that the three kinds of questionnaire was positively correlated each other(rs=0.65 for CAT and mMRC,rs=0.59 for CCQ and mMRC and rs=0.69 for CAT and CCQ,all P〈0.01) .The average time of filling out the mMRC was 102 +56 seconds,CAT was 187+64 seconds and CCQ was 234 +105 sec-onds.There were 42.6%,53.9%and 68.5%of patients needed the help of medical staff to fill the mMRC,CAT and CCQ question-naires,respectively.Conclusion The questionnaires of mMRC,CAT and CCQ are well correlated each other which can reflect the health and quality of life of patients with COPD reliably,efficiently and sensitively.
出处 《实用医院临床杂志》 2015年第1期59-60,共2页 Practical Journal of Clinical Medicine
关键词 慢性阻塞性肺疾病 相关性 可行性 生活质量 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Relevance Feasibility Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1J O rgen Vestbo, Suzanne SH, Alvar GA, et al. Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Pul- monary Disease [ J ]. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine,2013,187(4) :347-365.
  • 2Mahler DA, Wells CK. Evaluation of clinical methods for rating dysp- nea[ J ]. Chest, 1988,93 (3) :580-586.
  • 3柳涛,蔡柏蔷.一种新型的生活质量评估问卷:慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试[J].中国医学科学院学报,2010,32(2):234-238. 被引量:164
  • 4van der Molen T, Willemse BW, Schokker S, et al. Development, va- lidity and responsiveness of the clinical COPD questionnaire [ J ]. Health Qual Life Outcomes ,2003,28:1-13.
  • 5Stahl E, Jansson SA, Jonsson AC, et al. Health-related quality of life, utility, and productivity outcomes istruments:ease of completion by subjects with COPD [ J ]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2003,1 : 18- 24.
  • 6Reda AA, Kotz D, Kocks JW, et al. Reliability and validity of the clinical COPD questionnaire and chronic respiratory questionnaire [ J ]. Respir Med ,2012,104 : 1675-1682.
  • 7Marc M,Patricia GS, Alonso FN, et al. Course of COPD assessment test(CAT) and clinical COPD questionnaire (CCQ) scores during recovery from exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [ J]. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes,2013,11:147.

二级参考文献3

共引文献163

同被引文献576

引证文献53

二级引证文献371

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部