期刊文献+

不同种植方式花生生育后期湿涝胁迫对产量及保护性酶系统的影响 被引量:11

Effect of Waterlogging Stress on Peanut Yield and Protective Enzyme System in Different Planting Patterns
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为解决花生主产区生育后期因多雨易涝造成的花生减产问题,采用模拟人工淹水逆境的试验方法,研究花生不同生育时期湿涝胁迫对不同种植方式下花生产量及保护性酶系统的影响。结果表明,湿涝胁迫处理的花生产量较正常水分条件下平均降低13.62%,湿涝胁迫条件下,起垄种植较平作增产16.60%。花生植株受到水淹胁迫后,叶片SOD活性增加,POD、CAT活性下降,MDA含量上升,且平作处理的变化程度大于垄作处理,结荚期水淹处理的变化程度大于成熟期水淹,表明平作栽培条件下湿涝胁迫的危害程度大于起垄栽培,结荚期湿涝胁迫的危害程度大于成熟期。因此,在多雨易涝的花生产区,宜进行起垄种植,以降低湿涝胁迫的危害。 Experiment was conducted to study the effect of waterlogging stress on physiology and yield of peanut in different growth stage.Using the method of artificial flooding,the effects of waterlogging stress on peanut yield and protective enzyme system were studied in different planting patterns.The results showed that the waterlogging stress treatment led to 13.62% of yield loss compared with the control group.Under waterlogging stress conditions the yield of ridge planting was improved by 16.60% as compared with flat planting.Waterlogging stress increased the SOD activity and MDA content.It also decreased the POD and CAT activities.The impact of waterlogging was larger in pod setting stage than maturation stage,and it was also more harmful in flat planting than ridge planting.To reduce the damage of waterlogging stress,ridge planting pattern is recommended in rainy and waterlogged peanut areas.
出处 《河南农业科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第12期46-50,共5页 Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences
基金 国家现代农业产业技术体系项目(CARS-14) 河南省现代农业产业技术体系项目(S2012-5) 国家科技支撑计划项目(2014BAD11B04)
关键词 花生 种植方式 湿涝胁迫 保护酶 产量 peanut planting pattern waterlogging stress protective enzyme yield
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Robertson W K,Hammend L C.Effect of plantwaterstress on rootdistribution of corn,soybean and peanuts in sandy soil[J].Agronomy Journal,1980,72:548-550.
  • 2Nternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics(ICRISAT).Agrometeorology of groundnut:Proceedings of an international symposium[C].India:ICRISAT,1985.
  • 3Subbaiah C C,Sachs M M.Molecular and cellular adaptations of maize to flooding stress[J].Ann Bot,2003,91:119-127.
  • 4Krishnamoorthy H N,Goswami C L,Dayal J.Effect ofwaterlogging and growth retardants on peanut(Arachishypogaea L.)[J].Indian Journal of Plant Physiology,1981,24(4):381-385.
  • 5Krishnamoorthy H N.Effect of waterlogging and gibberellic acid on leaf gas exchange in peanut(Arachishypogaea L.)[J].Journal of Plant Physiology,1992,139:503-505.
  • 6Bishnoi N R,Krishnamoorthy H N.Effect of waterlogging and gibberellic acid on growth and yield of peanut(Arachis hypogaea L.)[J].Indian Journal of PlantPhysiology,1995,38(1):45-47.
  • 7Ketring D L,JordanW R,Smith O D,et al.Genetic variability in root and shoot growth characteristics ofpeanut[J].Peanut Science,1982,9:68-72.
  • 8程延年.未来气候变化对我国花生生产的影响[J].花生科技,1993,22(1):1-5. 被引量:12
  • 9李林,邹冬生,刘登望,刘飞,张武汉,孙玉桃,杨光立.花生等农作物耐湿涝性研究进展[J].中国油料作物学报,2004,26(3):105-110. 被引量:32
  • 10山东省福山县农业局.涝害对花生产量的影响[J].花生科技,1977(1):5-6.

二级参考文献64

共引文献1297

同被引文献193

引证文献11

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部