期刊文献+

基于分类修正的多证据合成方法 被引量:10

Combination method of multi-evidence based on classification correction
原文传递
导出
摘要 鉴于传统冲突量参数无法有效地衡量证据间的相似程度,提出一种基于分类修正的多证据合成方法,以解决证据合成中的高冲突悖论和"0"悖论.首先,利用证据距离参数、冲突量参数和方向角度参数共同衡量各证据间的相似程度,将证据分为一致证据、不冲突证据、低冲突证据以及高冲突证据4类;然后,利用3个参数赋予各类证据不同的修正系数;最后,利用Dempster规则对修正后的证据进行合成.算例分析表明,所提出的方法能够较好地解决高冲突悖论和"0"悖论,而且保留了证据理论优良的数学性质. Since the traditional conflict parameter can’t measure the degree of similarity between the evidence effectively, a combination method of evidence based on classification correction is proposed to solve the high conflict paradox and“0”paradox. Three parameters are used to measure the degree of similarity between the evidence together, including the evidence distance parameter, the conflict parameter and the direction parameter. According to the three parameters, the evidence is classified into four categories, including the consistent evidence, the no-conflict evidence, the low conflict evidence and the high conflict evidence. The different evidence is given different correction coefficients, and the revised evidence is combined by means of Dempster rule. Numerical experiments show that the proposed method can solve the high conflict paradox and“0”paradox well, and keep the good mathematical properties of evidence theory.
出处 《控制与决策》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第1期125-130,共6页 Control and Decision
基金 国家省部级预研基金项目(9140A27020210JB1404 9140A19030811JB1401)
关键词 证据理论 证据分类 修正系数 Dempster规则 evidence theory classification of evidence correction coefficient Dempster rule
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献112

共引文献618

同被引文献107

  • 1邢清华,雷英杰,刘付显.一种按比例分配冲突度的证据推理组合规则[J].控制与决策,2004,19(12):1387-1390. 被引量:42
  • 2陈天璐,阙沛文.D-S证据理论在数据融合中失效问题的研究[J].传感器技术,2004,23(12):25-27. 被引量:12
  • 3郭华伟,施文康,刘清坤,邓勇.一种新的证据组合规则[J].上海交通大学学报,2006,40(11):1895-1900. 被引量:57
  • 4杨善林,李永森,马溪骏,陈增明.基于技术进步和信息不对称的证据合成研究[J].系统工程学报,2007,22(3):268-273. 被引量:8
  • 5TAZID Ali, PALASH Dutta, HRISHIKESH Boru- ah. A New Combination Rule for Conflict Problem of Dempster-Shafer Evidence Theory [J]. International Journal of Energy, Information and Communications, 2012, 3(1) :35-40.
  • 6JOUSSELME A L, GRENIER D, BOSSE E. A New Distance Between two Bodies of Evidence [J]. Infor- mation Fusion, 2001(2):91-101.
  • 7HAN Deqiang , DEZERT Jean, YANG Yi. New Dis- tance Measures of Evidence Based on Belief Intervals [J]. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2014, 8764 (1): 432-441.
  • 8LIU W. Analyzing the degree of Conflict Among Be- lief Functions [J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2006, 170 (11) :909-924.
  • 9DEMPSTER A. Upper and Lower Probabilities In- duced by Muhivalued Mapping [J]. Annals of Math- ematical Statistics, 1967, 38 : 325-339.
  • 10YAGER R. On the Dempster Sharer Framework and new Combination Rules [J]. Information Sciences, 1987, 41(2) :93-137.

引证文献10

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部