期刊文献+

从“科学探究”到“科学实践”——科学教育的观念转变 被引量:54

原文传递
导出
摘要 美国新的科学教育标准采用"科学实践"取代了之前的"科学探究",其原因主要在于,在理论上对科学探究的理解缺乏统一的认识,在实践中科学探究未达到预期的效果,以及科学学习心理学的研究促进了科学教育观念的转变。从"科学实践"与"科学探究"两者描述的对象、与科学知识的关系、水平的界定三方面来看,科学探究重视完整的研究过程,科学实践关注具体的学生活动;科学探究与科学知识是并列的,科学实践与科学知识是融合的;科学探究按要素多少划分水平,科学实践按知识理解界定程度。
出处 《教育科学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期65-70,共6页 Educational Science Research
基金 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金"青少年科技创新能力发展水平测查研究"(20133704110007) 山东省自然科学基金项目"青少年科技创新能力发展研究"(ZR2012GM022)的成果之一
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Minner, D.D., Levy, A.J., & Century, J.Inquiry-based science instruction-what is it and does it matter?Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002[J].Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2010,47 ( 4 ) :474-496.
  • 2唐小为,丁邦平.“科学探究”缘何变身“科学实践”?——解读美国科学教育框架理念的首位关键词之变[J].教育研究,2012,33(11):141-145. 被引量:138
  • 3(美)国家研究理事会.国家科学教育标准[s].戢守志,等,译.北京:科学技术文献出版社,1999:30.
  • 4(美)国家研究理事会.科学探究与国家科学教育标准[s].罗星凯,等,译.北京:科学普及出版社,2004:24.
  • 5Germann, P. J., Haskins, S., &Auls, S.Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manuals:Promoting scientific inquiry [J].Joumal of Research in Science Teaching, 1996,33(5):475- 499.
  • 6Sandoval, W.A., &Reiser, B.J.Explanation- driveninquiry:Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry[J]. Science Education, 2004,88 ( 3 ) :345-372.
  • 7Abd-E1-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., et al. Inquiry in science education:International perspectives[J].Science Education, 2004,88(3):397-419.
  • 8Tamir, P.Inquiry and the science teacher[J].Science Education, 1983,67:657-672.
  • 9曾千纯,段晓林,温嫩纯.研究“探究师资培育计划”对中学科学/数学教师探究教学效能的影响[J].Research and Development,2012(64):27-58.
  • 10Zacharia, Z.Beliefs, attitudes, and intentions of science teachers regarding the educational use of computer simulations and in- quiry-based experiments in physics[J].Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2003,40 ( 8 ) :792-823.

二级参考文献12

  • 1National Research Council.A Framework for K-12 Seience Education:Practices,Crosscutting Concepts,and Core Ideas [M].Washington,DC:The National Academies Press,2012.30,42-44 ,44,45.
  • 2National Research Council.National Science Education Standards[S].Washington,D.C.:The National Academies Press,1996. 23,105.
  • 3C.R.Mann.The Interpretation of the College Entrance Examination Board's New Definition of the Requirement in Physies [J].Educational Review,1909(7).
  • 4John Dewey,Science as Subject-Matter and as Method[J].Science,1910, (1).
  • 5John Dewey.How We Think[M].Lexington,MA:Heath,1910.72.
  • 6Committee on the Objectives of a General Education in a Free Society .General Education in a Free Society:Report of the Harvard Committee[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1945.158.
  • 7John Dewey. How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process[M].Boston,MA:D.C.Heath and Company,1933.115-116.
  • 8Jerome Bruner.Process of Education[M].Boston,MA:Harbard University Press,1961.14.
  • 9Hammer. D..et al.Identifying Inquiry and Conceptualizing Students Abilities [A].R.Duschl & R.Grandy.Teaching Scientific INquiry [C].Rotterdam,The Netherlands:Sense Publishers,2005.138-156.
  • 10周玉芝.美国新版K-12科学教育框架对我国基础教育阶段科学教育的启示[J].课程.教材.教法,2012,32(6):120-124. 被引量:31

共引文献137

同被引文献313

引证文献54

二级引证文献185

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部