期刊文献+

沿海城市多灾种耦合危险性评估的初步研究——以福建泉州为例 被引量:11

Preliminary Study on Integrated Assessment for Multi-hazard of Coastal City: Case Study of Quanzhou,Fujian Province
下载PDF
导出
摘要 如何处理区域内多灾种之间的相互作用关系是当前多灾种综合风险评估研究的热点和难点之一。在梳理沿海城市多灾种之间相互作用关系的基础上,提出一种基于触发关系的多灾种耦合危险性评估方法。首先选取多指标建立单灾种分级方案,计算单灾种初始危险性指数;然后构建基于触发关系的多灾种耦合规则,结合GIS技术进行空间耦合,计算耦合后的危险性指数;最后对耦合后的多灾种危险性的综合进行了探讨。以福建省泉州市为例进行了案例研究,结果表明:该方法在多灾种耦合危险性评估中具有可行性,为后续多脆弱性和多灾种综合风险的研究提供支持,为决策者进行科学风险管理提供依据。 In recent years,more and more attention has been paid on multi-hazard assessment.However,the analysis of intricate relations among multiple hazards is still in the early stages of development.On the basis of i-dentification of relations among multiple hazards in the environment of coastal city,an integrated assessment ap-proach for multi-hazard is developed.First,an indicator-based approach is used to calculate the initial hazard index of each hazard.Second,a GIS-based triggering-triggered model is established to modify the initial index.Third, two ways are discussed to generate integrated multi-hazard map according to the updated hazard index.The method is then applied to Qauanzhou City.The application shows that the method is feasible in the assessment of integrated multi-hazard,which can be used as a supporting tool for the on-going research of multi-hazard risk assessment.Be-sides,the obtained results,the integrated hazard map along with a series of single hazard maps,can provide scien-tific evidence for the local risk management.
出处 《灾害学》 CSCD 2015年第1期211-216,共6页 Journal of Catastrophology
基金 国土资源部公益性行业科研专项基金(201211039-4)
关键词 多灾种 触发关系 危险性评估 沿海城市 福建泉州 GIS multiple hazards triggering impact hazard assessment coastal city GIS Quanzhou City of Fu-jian Province
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Sheik-Mujabar P, Chandrasekar N. Coastal erosion h~ard and vulnerability assessment for southern coastal Tamil Nadu of India by using remote ~nsing and GIS[ J ]. Natural Hazards, 2011,69 (3) : 1295 -1314.
  • 2Kappes M S, Keiler M, Glade T. From single to multi-hazard risk analyses: a concept addressing emerging challenges[ C]//Malct J P, Glade T, Casagli N. Proceedings of the ' Mountain Risks' In- ternational Conference. Strasbourg: CERG Editions, 2010 : 351 - 356.
  • 3Kappes M S, Keiler M, Elverfeldt K, et al. Challenges of analy- zing multi-hazard risk : a review [ J ~. Natural Hazards, 2012, 64 (2) : 1925 - 1958.
  • 4明晓东,徐伟,刘宝印,杜鹃,辜智慧,葛怡.多灾种风险评估研究进展[J].灾害学,2013,28(1):126-132. 被引量:44
  • 5Mnsquera-Machado S, Dilley M. A comparison of seleeted glnbal disaster risk assessment results [ J ]. Natural Hazards, 2009, 48 (3) : 439 -456.
  • 6Schmidt J, Matcham [, Reese S, et al. Quantitative multi-risk a- nalysis for natural hazards: a framework for multi-risk modelling [ J ]. Natural Hazards, 2011, 58( 3 ) : 1169 - 1192.
  • 7Klein J, Greiving S, Jarva J. Integrated natural risk legend andstandard for harmonised risk maps for land use planning and man- agement(Del 3. 2) [ R]. Espoo: ARMONIA, 2006.
  • 8盖程程,翁文国,袁宏永.基于GIS的多灾种耦合综合风险评估[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2011,51(5):627-631. 被引量:44
  • 9Xu C, Xu XW, Dai FC, et al. Comparison of different models for susceptibility mapping of earthquake triggered landslides related with the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China[ J~. Computers & Geosciences, 2012, 46:317 -329.
  • 10Marzocchi W, Garcia-Aristizabal A, Gasparini P, et al. Basic principles of multi-risk assessment: a case study in Italy[ J ]. Nat- ural Hazards, 2012, 62(2) : 551 -573.

二级参考文献51

  • 1Peijun Shi,Jiabing Shuai,Wenfang Chen,Lili Lu.Study on Large-Scale Disaster Risk Assessment and Risk Transfer Models[J].International Journal of Disaster Risk Science,2010,1(2):1-8. 被引量:10
  • 2王静爱,史培军,王瑛,李保俊,杨春燕,易湘生,王珏.中国城市自然灾害区划编制[J].自然灾害学报,2005,14(6):42-46. 被引量:23
  • 3闪淳昌.建立突发公共事件应急机制的探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2005,1(2):24-26. 被引量:47
  • 4Krausmann E, Cruz A M, Affeltranger B. The impact of the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake on industrial facilities [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2010, 23(2): 242-248.
  • 5Bell R, Glade T. Multi-hazard analysis in natural risk assessments [J]. Risk Analysis, 2004, 9:197 - 206.
  • 6Mark F, Stefan G, Benedikt S. Multi-risk assessment of spatially relevant hazards in Europe [C]//Process safety and industrial explosion protection: proceedings of the international ESMG symposium. Nnrnberg, Germany: European safety management group Press, 2005 : 1 - 14.
  • 7LI Hua, Apostolakis G E, Joseph G, et al. Ranking the risks from multiple hazards in a small community [J]. Risk Analysis, 2009, 29(3):438-456.
  • 8Silvia M M, Maxx D. A comparison of selected global disaster risk assessment results [J]. Natural Hazards, 2009 48(3): 439 - 456.
  • 9Thierry P, Stielties L, Kouokam E, et al. Multi-hazard risk mapping and assessment on an active volcano: the GRINP project at Mount Cameroon[J]. Natural Hazards, 2008, 45(3) : 429 - 456.
  • 10Bovolo C I, Abele S J, Bathurst J C, et al. A distributed framework for multi-risk assessment of natural hazards used to model the effects of forest fire on hydrology and sediment yield [J]. Computers &Geosciences, 2009, 35(5). 924- 945.

共引文献75

同被引文献163

引证文献11

二级引证文献77

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部