期刊文献+

农业水权和排污权相互置换的探讨 被引量:2

Explore the substitution between agricultural water right and pollution emission permit
原文传递
导出
摘要 在当前用水和排污限额几乎耗尽的情况下,水权和排污权交易能够提供的水资源或水环境调控空间相当有限。为此,本文以水环境裕量为置换出发点,探讨了农业水权和排污权相互置换的思路,根据置换参与方和置换效果确定了不同的置换方式,并针对水权排污权分别定价方式无法确定置换中第三方正效应购回费用的缺陷,提出了基于水体污染物浓度变化的水权排污权集成定价方法。算例分析表明,水权排污权相互置换可行域显著大于水权和排污权单独交易可行域,能适应更严格的水环境要求。 In the current situation that the quotas of water abstraction and pollution emission are nearly exhausted, and the function of water trade and pollution emission permit trade is rather limited. For this reason,this article discusses the substitution between agriculturral water right and emission permit from the aspect of water environment allowance, identifies different types of substitution according to the participant and effects. To overcome the weakness that the buyback cost for positive third-party effects can not be identified using separate pricing about water and pollution emission permits in substitution, the integrated pricing basing on the change of water pollutant concentration is put forward. The example analysis shows that, the feasible region of substitution is significantly greater than the feasible regions of separate trade of water or pollution emission permit,and the substitution is able to adapt to more stringent water environmental requirements.
出处 《水利学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第12期1464-1471,共8页 Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
基金 长江科学院开放研究基金资助项目(CKWV2012316/KY) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(41001379 51239004)
关键词 水权 排污权 置换 集成定价 农业 water right pollution emission permit substitution integrated pricing agriculture
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Turral H N, Etchells T, Malano H M M, et al. Water trading at the margin : The evolution of water markets in the Murray-Darling Basin[J]. Water Resources Research, 2005, 41(7) : 11-18.
  • 2Fcrsund F R, Nevdal E. Efficiency gains under exchange-rate emission trading[J]. Environmental and Re- source Economics, 1998, 12(4) : 403-423.
  • 3Klaassen G, FCrsund F R, Amann M. Emissions trading in Europe with an exchange rate[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1994, 4(4) : 305-330.
  • 4Horan R D, Shortle J S, Abler D G. Point-nonpoint nutrient trading in the Susquehanna River basin[J]. WaterResources Research, 2002, 38(5) : 1050-1061..
  • 5Farrow R S, Sehultz M T, Celikkol P, et al. Pollution trading in water quality limited areas: Use of benefits as- sessmew: and cost-effective trading ratios[J]. Land Economies, 2005, 81(2) : 191-205.
  • 6Duke C, Gangadharan L. Salinity in water markets: An experimental investigation of the Sunraysia Salinity Levy in Australia[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 68(1-2) : 486-503.
  • 7Jordan J L. Externalities, water prices, and water transfers[J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Associ- ation, 1999, 35(5): 1007-1013.
  • 8Bennett L L. The integration of water quality into transboundary allocation agreements Lessons from the southwest- ern United States[J]. Agricultural Economics, 2000, 24( 1 ) : 113-125.
  • 9Montgomery W D. Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 1972, 95(3): 395-418.
  • 10Krupnick A J, Oates W E, Eric V D V. On marketable air-pollution permits: The case for a system of pollution offsets[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1983, 10(3) : 233-247.

二级参考文献57

共引文献236

同被引文献33

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部