摘要
以某商务办公建筑为例,通过分析计算同等建筑条件下三种楼盖的土建费用、层高降低费用及土建综合造价,对薄壁蜂巢芯空心楼盖与圆筒芯空心楼盖及传统板梁楼盖的经济性进行了分析比较,结果表明,对常规柱距及荷载,采用蜂巢芯空心楼盖比采用圆筒芯空心楼盖和传统板梁楼盖具有较显著的经济性。
With a commercial office building as an example, through calculation of civil engineering cost, floor height decrease cost and comprehensive civil engineering cost for three kinds of floor under the same building condition, the economies of thin-walled honeycomb core hollow floor, thin-walled cylindrical core hollow floor and traditional slab were analyzed and compared, and the result shows that, in view of normal column space and load, adopting honeycomb core hollow floor has more remarkable economy than adopting cylindrical core hollow floor and traditional slab.
出处
《工程建设》
2014年第6期51-55,共5页
Engineering Construction
关键词
蜂巢芯空心楼盖
圆筒芯空心楼盖
传统板梁楼盖
经济性分析
比较
honeycomb core hollow floor
cylindrical core hollow floor
traditional floor
economic analysis
comparison