期刊文献+

大肠埃希菌多耐药与生物被膜相关性分析 被引量:8

Analysis of the correlation of the multi-drug resistance of Escherichia coli isolates and their biofilm formation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨细菌耐药程度与细菌生物被膜(BBF)之间的相关性。方法收集临床分离的大肠埃希菌药物敏感株29株,单耐药菌株21株,多耐药菌株60株,采用银染法,以"+"作为BBF量化指标,激光共聚焦显微镜层扫BBF厚度,每个视野扫描8-32层,求平均值。同时采用扫描电镜观察BBF生长情况。结果银染结果药物敏感组"﹣"有5株、"+"15株、"2+"8株、"3+"1株;单耐药菌株组"﹣"有3株、"+"6株、"2+"10株、"3+"1株、"4+"1株;多耐药菌株组"﹣"有1株、"+"7株、"2+"15株、"3+"16株、"4+"21株;多耐药组BBF高于药物敏感组和单耐药组(χ2=15.545,P〈0.05)差异有统计学意义。激光共聚焦显微镜层扫多耐药组BBF厚度为(47.97±9.53)μm,药物敏感组和单耐药组分别为(25.91±5.84)μm和(31.84±4.91)μm,多耐药组与药物敏感组和单耐药组比较差异有统计学意义(F=48.70,P〈0.05)。扫描电镜观察BBF生长,药物敏感组细菌多为杆状生长。多耐药菌株组细菌之间黏液样物质明显增多,细菌相互包裹成块状,47株有大块状。单耐药菌株组中有2株大块状。结论多耐药大肠埃希菌BBF量或厚度高于单耐药及药物敏感大肠埃希菌,表明BBF与大肠埃希菌多耐药有关。 Objective To examine the correlation between bacterial drug resistance and bacterial biofilm(BBF).Methods Clinical isolates of 29 strains of drug-sensitive E.coli,21 strains of single-drug-resistant E.coli,and 60 strains of multi-drug-resistant E.coli were collected.BBF was stained with silver stain and'+'served as a quantitative index.The thickness of the BBF was determined with confocal laser scanning microscopy.In each field,8-32 layers were scanned and the thickness was averaged.Scanning electron microscopy was used to observe BBF growth. ResultsSemiquantitative analysis of the BBF with silver staining indicated that 5of the drug-sensitive strains were "-",15 were " +",8were "2+",and 1was "3+".Three of the single-drug-resistant strains were "-",6were " +",10 were " 2+",1was "3+",and 1was "4+".One of the multi-drug-resistant strains was "-",7were " +",15 were "2+",16 were "3+",and 21 were "4+".Semiquantitative analysis of the BBF with silver staining indicated that multi-drug resistant strains had more BBF than the drug-sensitive strains or the single-drug-resistant strains(χ2=15.545,P〈0.05).Quantitative analysis of the BBF's thickness with confocal laser scanning microscopy indicated that the mean thickness of the BBF was(47.97±9.53)μm for multi-drug-resistant strains,(25.91±5.84)μm for drug-sensitive strains,and(31.84±4.91)μm for single-drug-resistant strains.Multi-drug-resistant strains had a thicker BBF than the drug-sensitive strains or the single-drug-resistant strains(F=48.70,P〈0.05).BBF growth observed with scanning electron microscopy indicated that most of the drug-sensitive strains had rod growth.Multi-drug-resistant strains had a marked increase in mucus-like material and encapsulated cells in clumps.Forty-seven of those strains produced large clumps of cells.Two of the 21single-drug-resistant strains produced large clumps of cells. Conclusion Multi-drug-resistant E.coli had more BFF and thicker BFF than did single-drug-resistant or drug-sensitive E.coli.This indicated that BBF is directly correlated with multi-drug resistance of E.coli.
出处 《中国病原生物学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第11期975-978,共4页 Journal of Pathogen Biology
基金 四川省卫生厅课题项目(No.110351)
关键词 细菌耐药性 生物被膜 相关性 Bacterial drug resistance biofilm correlation
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Hoiby N, Bjarnsholt T, Givskov M, et al. Antibiotic resistance of bacterial biofilms[J]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2010, 35(4): 322-32.
  • 2Jacobsen SM, Stickler DJ, Mobley HLT, et al. Complicatedcath- eter-associated urinarytract infections due to Escherichia coli and froteus mirabilis[J]. Clini Micro Biol Rewiew, 2008, 21(1) : 26 -59.
  • 3梁群,孙晖,蒋希成.大蒜提取液与环丙沙星联合对铜绿假单胞菌PAO1与PAO-JP2的形态学影响[J].中医药信息,2012,29(4):148-151. 被引量:2
  • 4芦起,华子瑜,包蕾,王家蓉,林雅茵,冉桃,林丽华,余加林,杨锡强.铜绿假单胞菌群体感应系统缺陷株生物膜形成和结构定量分析[J].中国微生态学杂志,2010,22(3):206-209. 被引量:2
  • 5曲颖.产超广谱β-内酰胺酶大肠埃希菌的临床分布及耐药性分析[J].中国病原生物学杂志,2013,8(6):564-566. 被引量:9
  • 6Radzig MA1, Nadtochenko VA, Koksharova OA, et al. Antibac- terial effects of silver nanoparticles on gram-negative bacteria: in- fluence on the growth and biofilms formation, mechanisms of ac- tion[J]. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaees, 2013, 1(102): 300-6.
  • 7Lopez D, Vlamakis H, Koher R. Biofilms[J]. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 2010, 2(7): a000398.
  • 8Van den Driessche F, Rigole P, Brackman G, et al. Optimization of resazurin-based viability staining for quantification of microbial biofilms[J]. J Microbiol Methods, 2014 (98) : 31- 4.
  • 9Ahieri KT, Sanita PV, Machado AL, et al. Eradication of a ma ture methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) biofilm from acrylic surfaces[J]. BrazDent J, 2013, 24(5): 487-91.
  • 10Romero R, Schaudinn C, Kusanovic JP, et ah Detection of a microbial biofilm in intraamniotic infection[J]. Am J Obstet Gy- necol, 2008, 198(1): 1351-5.

二级参考文献28

  • 1刘晓岚,宋志军,孔晋亮,王恒壮,吴红,陈海荣,陈一强.群体感应系统对铜绿假单胞菌生物膜形成的影响[J].现代医药卫生,2006,22(20):3081-3082. 被引量:5
  • 2年华,褚云卓,王倩.医院感染大肠埃希菌耐药性变化分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2007,17(4):452-454. 被引量:37
  • 3BAUER T T,TORRES A, FERRER R, et al. Biofilm formation in endotracheal tubes. Association between pneumonia and the persistence of pathogens[ J]. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis,2002,57( 1 ) :84-87.
  • 4GIRARD G, BLOEMBERG G V. Central role of quorum sensing in regulating the production of pathogenicity factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa[ J]. Future Microbiol,200 ,3 ( 1 ) :97-106.
  • 5CHRISTENSEN L D, MOSER C, JENSEN P O, et al. Impact of Pseudomonas aentginosa quorum sensing on biofilm persistence in an in vlvo intraperitoneal foreign-body infection model [ J ]. Microbiology, 2007, 153(Pt 7) :2312-2320.
  • 6O'TOOLE G A, KOLTER R. Initiation of biofilm formation in Pseudomonas fluorcscens WCS365 proceeds via multiple, convergent signalling pathways: a genetic analysis [ J ]. Mol Microbiol, 1998,28 ( 3 ) : 449-461.
  • 7HENTZER M, WU H, ANDERSEN J B, et al. Attenuation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence by quorum sensing inhibitors[ J]. EMBO, 2003,22 ( 15 ) :3803-3815.
  • 8BEYENAL H, DONOVAN C, LEWANDOWSKI Z, et al. Three-dimensional biofilm structure quantification[ J]. J Microbiol Methods,2004, 59(3) :395-413.
  • 9DAVIES D G, PARSEK M R, PEARSON J P, et al. The involvement of cell-to-cell signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm[ J]. Science, 1998,280(5361 ) :295-298.
  • 10BEYENAL H, LEWANDOWSKI Z, HARKIN G. Quantifying biofilm structure: facts and fiction [ J ]. Biofouling, 2004,20 ( 1 ) : 1-23.

共引文献16

同被引文献90

  • 1范燕,王睿,安毛毛,蔡芸,梁蓓蓓,刘茹,柴栋,裴斐.磷霉素与氨基糖苷类药物联用对体外铜绿假单胞菌生物被膜形态学的影响[J].中国药物应用与监测,2007,4(5):18-20. 被引量:10
  • 2David L, Jean-Marc G, Christophe B. Biofilm-related infections: bridging the gap between clinical management and fundamental as- pects of recalcitrance toward antibiotics[J]. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 2014, 78(3): 501 6.
  • 3Heleen VA, Patrick VD, Tom C. Molecular mechanisms of anti microbial tolerance and resistance in bacterial and fungal biofilms [J]. TrendsMicrobiol, 2014, 22(6).. 326-33,.
  • 4Liang Y, Yang L, Hong W, et al. Combating biofilms[J]. FEMS Immunol Med Mic, 2012, 65(2): 146-57.
  • 5Seth YT, Su CC, Sean YT, et al. Emerging frontiers in detection and control of bacterial biofilms[J]. Curr Opin Biotech, 2014 (26): 1-6.
  • 6Khan W, Bernier SP, Kuchma SL, et al. Aminoglyeoside resist- ance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilrns modulated by extracellu- lar polysaccharide[J]. Int Microbiol, 2010, 13(4): 207 12.
  • 7Mulcahy H, Charron-Mazenod L, Lewenza S. Extracellular DNA chelates cations and induces antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms[J]. PLoSPathog, 2008, 4(11): 1 12.
  • 8Dwyer DJ, Kohanski MA, Collins JJ. Role of reactive oxygen species in antibiotic action and resistance[J]. Curr Opin Microbi ol, 2009, 12(5): 482-9.
  • 9Aiassa V, Barnes AI, Albesa I. Resistance to ciprofloxacin by enhancement of antioxidant defenses in biofilm and planktonic Proteusmirubilis[J]. BiochemBiophRes Co, 2010, 393(1): 84 -8.
  • 10Wel Q, Tarighi S, Dotsch A, et al. phenotypic and genome-wide analysis of an antibiotic-resistant small colony variant(SCV) of Pseudomonasaeruginosa[J]. PloSOne, 2011, 6(12): 1-14.

引证文献8

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部