期刊文献+

GRACE与TIMI评分对非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征住院心性死亡风险预测的比较 被引量:4

COMPARISON OF THE PROGNOSTIC VALUE BETWEEN GRACE AND TIMI SCORES SYSTEM IN THE IN-HOSPITAL CARDIAC DEATH IN PATIENTS WITH NON-ST ELEVATED ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨全球急性冠状动脉事件注册(GRACE)评分与心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)评分对非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征(NSTEACS)患者住院期间发生心性死亡的预测价值.方法:查阅2008年1月至2012年12月在我院住院期间发生心性死亡且接受过冠脉造影的NSTEACS患者16例为死亡组.同期抽取未发生心性死亡的NSTEACS患者175例为生存组.分别计算每位患者的GRACE评分与TIMI评分.分别描绘两种评分的ROC曲线并计算曲线下面积(AUC),以及采用非参数检验对曲线下面积进行比较.结果:GRACE评分预测住院期间心性死亡的准确度为AUC=0.864,95%CI:0.763~0.933,TI-MI评分预测住院期间心性死亡的准确度为AUC=0.717,95% CI:0.598~0.817.两评分曲线下面积比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),GRACE评分曲线下面积大于TIMI评分,GRACE评分较TIMI评分的预测价值更高.结论:GRACE评分和TIMI评分对NSTEACS患者住院期间发生心性死亡均有较好的预测价值,GRACE评分的预测价值优于TIMI评分. Objective:To compare GRACE and TIMI scores in the evaluation of prognosis of in-hospital cardiac death in patients with non-ST elevated acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS).Methods:The patients with NSTEACS were enrolled in the study who were admitted to hospitals consecutively from Jan.2008 to Dec.2012.There were 16 NSTEACS patients with in-hospital cardiac deaths and known coronary artery disease (CAD,prior stenosis ≥ 50%) or stenosis ≥ 50% of in-hospital coronary arteriography.Survival group consisted of 175 random contemporary NSTEACS patients with known CAD (prior stenosis ≥ 50%) or stenosis ≥50% of in-hospital coronary arteriography.The TIMIand GRACE scores were calculated according to the baseline characteristics on admission.The predictive value of the model was assessed with evaluation of the area under curve (AUC) in receiver-operating characteristic analysis.C-statistics were calculated to compare the discriminative capacities of different scores for in-hospital cardiac death.The areas under correlated ROC curves were compared by a nonparametric approach.Results:For in-hospital cardiac death,the AUC (0.864) of GRACE score was more than the AUC (0.717) of TIMI score,so GRACE score displayed significantly better discrimination than the TIMI score (P 〈0.001,both comparisons).Conclusion:Both GRACE and TIMI scores display high predictive value,GRACE score is superior.
出处 《广西医科大学学报》 CAS 2014年第5期772-775,共4页 Journal of Guangxi Medical University
关键词 非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征 GRACE评分 TIMI评分 心性死亡 non-ST elevated acute coronary syndrome grace score TIMI score cardiac death
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous O, et al. Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute cor- onary events [J]. Archives of Internal Medicine, 2003, 163(19) :2 345 2 353.
  • 2Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: Amethod for prognostication and therapeutic decision making[J]. JAMA, 2000,284(7) :835-842.
  • 3De ArauJo Goncalves P, Ferreira J, Aguiar C, et al.'TI- MI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores., sustained prognostic value and interaction with revascularization in NSTE-NSTEACS [J]. European Heart Journal, 2005,26(9) : 865-872.
  • 4Aragam KG, Tamhane UU, Kune Rogerse, et al. Does simplicity compromise accuracy in ACS risk prediction? A restrospective analysis of the TIMI and GRACE risk scores[J]. Plos One,2009,4(11) :e7- 947.
  • 5Yan AT, Yan RT, Tan M, et al. Risk scores for risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes: useful but simpler is not necessarily better[J]. Eur Heart J,2007, 28:1 072.
  • 6无,沈卫峰,胡大一.非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征诊断和治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2012,40(5):353-367. 被引量:676
  • 7Ramsay G, Podogrodzka M, McCture C, et al. Risk pre- diction in patients presenting with suspected cardiac pain: The GRACE and TMI risk scores versus clinical evaluation[J].Q J Med, 2007,100 : 8-11.
  • 8陈华,张建义,刘世杰,池慧,阳耀忠,莫新玲,夏中华,潘迪华,李全忠.心率震荡对急性冠脉综合征患者危险分层的意义[J].广西医科大学学报,2011,28(4):526-528. 被引量:2
  • 9Steg PG, Dabbous OH, Feldman LJ, et al. Determinants and prognostic impact of heart failure complicating a- cute coronary syndromes: Observations from the Glob- al Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE)[J].Circulation, 2004,109 : 494-499.
  • 10Freeman RV, Mehta RH, A1 Badr W, et al. Influence of concurrent renal dysfunction on outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes and implications of the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003, 41 : 718-724.

二级参考文献10

共引文献676

同被引文献64

引证文献4

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部