期刊文献+

乳腺癌患者术前^(18)F-FDG PET/CT显像肿瘤代谢体积测定的预后价值 被引量:9

Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume measured by ^(18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging in preoperative breast cancer patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨乳腺癌患者术前2-氟-2-脱氧-D-葡萄糖(18F-FDG)PET/CT显像肿瘤代谢体积(MTV)测定的预后价值。方法回顾分析18例晚期女性乳腺浸润性导管癌患者术前18F-FDG PET/CT显像,通过三维感兴趣区测定MTV和最大标准摄取值(SUVmax),采用ROC曲线分析、Kaplan-Meier生存分析和log-rank检验、Cox回归风险分析评估其对无进展生存期(PFS)的影响。结果 ROC曲线分析MTV ROC曲线下面积(AUCs)0.908(95%置信区间CI 0.764~1.052,P=0.009)、SUVmax AUCs 0.823(95%CI 0.549~1.098,P=0.038),Stage AUCs 0.746(95%CI 0.488~1.004,P=0.115),Age AUCs 0.769(95%CI 0.526~1.012,P=0.085)。MTV、SUVmax的ROC下面积与从原点到右上角参考线下面积0.5比较,差异有统计学意义,MTV预测无进展生存期价值较高,SUVmax价值中等,MTV界值为6.35 cm3,SUVmax界值9.05。Kaplan-Meier生存分析MTV<6.35 cm3平均PFS时间45.5个月(95%CI 41.256~49.744),MTV≥6.35 cm3平均PFS时间26.13个月(95%CI22.87~29.39),2组间差异有统计学意义(P=0.001)。总PFS时间31.99月(95%CI 27.01~36.97),MTV≥6.35 cm3组中位PFS时间27.00月(95%CI 24.18~29.82)。Cox回归单变量分析MTV HR 3.179(95%CI 1.563~6.462,P=0.001)、SUVmax HR2.962(95%CI 1.494~5.875,P=0.002)、Stage HR 4.692(95%CI 1.375~16.013,P=0.014)、Age HR 1.063(95%CI 1.006~1.124,P=0.031);多变量分析MTV、Stage进入Cox回归方程,MTV HR 4.169(95%CI 1.691~10.281,P=0.002),Stage HR11.392(95%CI0.949~136.731,P=0.055),Cox风险模型表达式为h(t)=h0(t)exp(1.428MTV+2.433stage)。结论晚期女性乳腺浸润性导管癌患者术前18F-FDG PET/CT显像测定MTV对无进展生存期预测及肿瘤进展风险评估有较高的临床价值。 Objective To explore the prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in preoperative breast cancer patients. Methods Preoperative 18F- FDG PET/CT imaging in 18 female patients with advanced breast infiltrating ductal cancer were reviewed, and the metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and maximum standardized uptake value (SU- Vmax) from 3-D ROI of local lesion were measured. The cut-off value of MTV for predicting aggression was determined by using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The effects of progression free survival of patients was compared with MTV, SUVmax, stage, age by ROC curve analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test, Cox Regression Hazard analysis. Results MTV AUCs was 0. 908(95 % CI 0. 764 - 1. 052, P = 0. 009), SUVmax AUCs was 0. 823(95 % CI0. 549- 1. 098, P = 0. 038), Stage AUCs was 0. 746(95 % CI0. 488 - 1. 004, P = 0. 115), Age AUCs was 0. 769 (95 % CI 0. 526 - 1. 012, P = 0. 085). The AUCs of MTV and SUVmax were significantly higher than reference line (P was 0. 009 and 0. 038 respectively). The cutoff value of MTV for predicting agression was 6.3 5 mL by ROC curve analyzing, SUVmax was 9.0 5.Kaplan - Meier analyzing, Mean time of PFS was 4 5 . 5 months in MTV 〈 6 . 3 5 mL ( 9 5 % CI 41. 256 - 49. 744), but MTV≥6.35 mL was 26. 128 months(95% CI 22.87 - 29.39). Overall time of PFS was 31.99 months(95% CI 27.01- 36.97). In MTV≥6.35 mL, median time of PFS was 27.00 months(95% CI 24.18- 29.82). In univariate analysis COX Regression Hazard a, MTV HR 3. 179(95 % CI 1. 563 - 6. 462, P = 0. 001), SUVmax HR 2. 962(95 % CI 1. 494 -5. 875,P=0.002),StageHR4.692(95%CI1.375-16.013,P=0.014),AgeHR 1. 063 (95 % CI 1. 006- 1. 124, P = 0. 031). In multivariate analyses of COX Regression Hazard, the both variates of MTV and Stage were entered the Hazard function. MTV HR 4. 169 (95 % CI1. 691 - 10. 281,P = 0. 002) ,StageHR 11. 392(95 % CIO. 949 - 136. 731, P = 0. 0 5 5 ). The formulaof Cox Regression Hazard function was h ( t ) = h0 ( t ) exp ( 1.4 2 8 MTV + 2. 433stage). Conclusion The metabolic tumor volume measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in preoperative female advanced infiltrating ductal carcinoma of breast(IDC) patients has a great clinical significance in predicting PFS and evaluating aggressive hazard.
出处 《实用临床医药杂志》 CAS 2014年第21期55-59,共5页 Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
关键词 乳腺癌 正电子发射断层显像术 氟脱氧葡萄糖F18 体层摄影术 X线计算机 肿瘤代谢体积 breast cancer positron-emission tomography fluorodeoxyglucose F18 tpmography X-ray computed metabolic tumor volume(MTV)
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Jemal A,Center M M,Desantis C.Global Patterns of Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates and Trends[J].Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev,2010,19(8):1893.
  • 2The National Cancer Institute of the U.S.Surveillance,Epidemiology,and End Results(SEER)Program.http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html(accessed Jue 24,2014).
  • 3Wanqing Chen,Rongshou Zheng,Siwei Zhang,Ping Zhao,Guanglin Li,Lingyou Wu,Jie He.Report of incidence and mortality in China cancer registries, 2009[J].Chinese Journal of Cancer Research,2013,25(1):10-21. 被引量:205
  • 4Kumar R,Halanaik D,Malhotra A.Clinical applications of positron emission tomography-computed tomography in oncology[J].Cancer,2010,47(2):100.
  • 5Dholakia A S,Chaudhry M A,Leal J P,et al.Baseline Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis Are Associated With Survival Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Receiving Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2014,89(3):539.
  • 6Soydal C,Yüksel C,Küük N,et al.Prognostic Value of Metabolic Tumor Volume Measured by18F-FDG PET/CT in Esophageal Cancer Patients[J].Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther,2014,23(1):12.
  • 7Vu C C,Matthewa R,Kim B,et al.Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis from18FFDG PET/CT in patients undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer[J].Nucl Med Commun,2013,34(10):959.
  • 8Chung H H,Kim J W,Han K H,Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume measured by FDG-PET/CT in patients with cervical cancer[J].Gynecol Oncol,2011,120(2):270.
  • 9Pak K,Cheon G J,Nam H Y,et al.Prognostic Value of Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis in Head and Neck Cancer:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J].J Nucl Med,2014,55(6):884.
  • 10Groheux D,Giacchetti S,Moretti J L,et al.Correlation of high 18 F-FDG uptake to clinical,pathological and biological prognostic factors in breast cancer[J].Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging,2011,38(3):426.

二级参考文献26

  • 1Cardoso F.Metastatic breast cancer patients:the forgotten heroes![J].Breast,2009,18 (5):271-272.
  • 2Largillier R,Ferrero JM,Doyen J,et al.Prognostic factors in 1,038 women with metastatic breast cancer[J].Ann Oncol,2008,19 (12):2012-2019.
  • 3Andre F,Slimane K,Bachelot T,et al.Breast cancer with synchronous metastases:trends in survival during a 14-year period[J].J Clin Oncol,2004,22 (16):3302-3308.
  • 4Sundquist M,Eriksson Z,Tejler G,et al.Trends in survival in metastatic breast cancer[J].Eur J Cancer,2010,8 (3):191 (abstract 453).
  • 5Foukakis T,Fomander T,Lekberg T,et al.Age-specific trends of survival in metastatic breast cancer:26 years longitudinal data from a population-based cancer registry in Stockholm,Sweden[J].Breast Cancer Res Treat,2011,130 (2):553-560.
  • 6Cardoso F,Costa A,Norton L,et al.1st International consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 1)[J].Breast,2012,21 (3):242-252.
  • 7National Comprehensive Cancer Network.NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines,for Breast Cancer,version 3,NCCN,2013.
  • 8Kostov DV,Kobakov GL,Yankov DV.Prognostic factors related to surgical outcome of liver metastases of breast cancer[J].J Breast Cancer,2013,16 (2):184-192.
  • 9Rashaan ZM,Bastiaannet E,Portielje JE,et al.Surgery in metastatic breast cancer:patients with a favorable profile seem to have the most benefit from surgery[J].Eur J Surg Oncol,2012,38 (1):52-56.
  • 10Wilcken N,Hornbuckle J,Ghersi D.Chemotherapy alone versus endocrine therapy alone for metastatic breast cancer[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2003,(2):CD002747.

共引文献206

同被引文献46

  • 1Im HJ, Kim YK, Kim YI, et al. Usefulness of combined meta- bolic-volumetric indices of ^18F-FDG PET/CT for the early prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy outcomes in breast cancer[ J]. Nucl Med Mol Imaging,2013 ,47( 1 ) :36 -43.
  • 2Taherian-Fard A, Srihari S, Ragan MA. Breast cancer classifi- cation: linking molecular mechanisms to disease prognosis [ J ]. Brief Bioinform,2015,16 (3) :461 - 474.
  • 3Koolen BB ,Pengel KE ,Wesseling J,et al. Relevance of breast cancer subtypes in response monitoring with ^18F-FDG PET/CT during neoadjuvant chemotherapy [ J ]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2012,38 (48) :777 - 778.
  • 4Haug AR, Tiega Donfack BP, Trumm C. ^18F-FDG PET/CT predicts survival after radioembalization of hepatic metastases from breast cancer[J]. J Nucl Med,2012,53(3) :371 -377.
  • 5Carkaei S,Sherman CT,Ozkan E,et al.^18F-FDG PET/CT pre- dicts survival in patients with inflammatory breast cancer un- dergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy [ J ]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging,2013,40(12) :1 809 -1 816.
  • 6Garcia Gareia-Esquinas M,Garcia-Saenz JA,Arrazola Garcia J, et al. is F-FDG PET-CT imaging in the neoadjuvant setting for stages Ⅱ - Ⅲ breast cancer: association of loeo-regional SUVmax with classical prognostic factors [ J ]. Q J Nucl Med Mol Ima- ging,2014,58( 1 ) :66 -73.
  • 7Shin S, Pak K, Park do Y, et al. Tumor heterogeneity as- sessed by ^18F-FDG PET/CT is not significantly associated with nodal metastasis in breast cancer patients [ J ]. Oncol Res Treat,2016,39 ( 1 - 2) :61 - 66.
  • 8Garcia Vicente AM, Amo-Salas M, Relea Calatayud F, et al. Prognostic role of early and end-of-neoadjuvant treatment ^18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with breast cancer [ J/OL]. Clin Nucl Med. (2016-03-05) [ 2016-03-15 ]. http ://jour- nals. lww. com/nuclearmed/Abstract/publishahead/Prognos- tic_Role of Early and End of Neoadjuvant. 98536. aspx.
  • 9Koolen BB,Pengel KE,Wesseling J,et al. Sequential ^18F-FDG PET/CT for early prediction of complete pathological response in breast and axilla during neoadjuvant chemotherapy [ J ]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging,2014,41(1):32-40.
  • 10Lee JW, Kang CM, Choi HJ, et al. Prognostic value of meta- bolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis on preopera- tive ^18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with pancreatic cancer [J]. J Nucl Med,2014,55(6):898 -904.

引证文献9

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部