摘要
选取《重庆医学》编辑部2013—2014年20篇投稿论文,分别采用CNKI科技期刊学术不端文献检测系统(AMLC)和维普——通达论文引用检测系统进行检测,比较2个系统检测结果的差异性。结果发现同一篇论文经过不同检测系统检测存在差异,复制率差异最小为0.31%,最高为40.9%。基于不同学术不端检测系统的检测结果存在一定差异性,编辑部应该探索对投稿稿件进行复制率检测的合理方式。
To compare the differences of detection results from different academic misconduct literature detection systems,both CNKI academic misconduct literature periodical detection system（AMLC）and Vip-Tonda text matching system were used to detect 20 papers submitted to Chongqing Medicine. The study showed that there were different values of replication rate at a range from 0.31%to 40.9%of the same paper’s detection result by different systems and different detection results were demonstrated by different academic misconduct literature detection systems. It is suggested that editorial departments should explore a reasonable way to detect the replication rate of manuscripts submitted.
出处
《天津科技》
2014年第12期71-73,共3页
Tianjin Science & Technology
基金
2012年重庆报刊发展专项资助基金(渝新出版(2012)176号)
关键词
学术不端
检测系统
差异性
academic misconduct
detection system
difference
