期刊文献+

亚里士多德的“藩篱”与认知隐喻研究

Aristotle's “Fence”and the Study of Cognitive Metaphor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 亚里士多德作为最早对隐喻进行系统性研究的理论家,无论是在对隐喻概念与研究范畴的界定还是隐喻的分类及标准等方面,其理论对后世的相关研究有着复杂而深远的影响。所谓亚里士多德的"藩篱",是指隐喻研究中较为普遍的一种看法,认为他将隐喻看作特殊的语言现象,主要从语词层面探讨隐喻问题,其理论也局限于修辞学范畴之内,对于隐喻研究在当代的认知向度并无太大的启示。文章通过对这一问题的辨析,指出无论是在理论前提、类型划分和具体观点等层面,亚里士多德的隐喻理论都仍具有重要的理论价值和启示性。辨析亚里士多德的"藩篱",并不是为了让隐喻研究回归亚里士多德,而是通过澄清对其隐喻观的误解来说明在当代隐喻研究中还有许多观念需要探讨和匡正。 As one of the earliest theorists who studied the concept of metaphor systematically, Aristotle' theory has complex and profound influence, whether in the research of the definition, classification and standards. The so - called "fence" of Aristotle is a kind of view of cognitive metaphorical study that Aristotle' s study on metaphor was limited to words, and he regarded metaphor as a special phenomenon deviating from the everyday language, therefore his research on metaphor was confined to the category of rhetoric and wasnot of an inspiration, especially in cognitive study of metaphor thus far. The main idea of this article is to explain that Aristotle' s views still have the theoretical value.
作者 郭琳
出处 《湖北文理学院学报》 2014年第12期23-27,34,共6页 Journal of Hubei University of Arts and Science
基金 2014年度湖北省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目(14Q086)
关键词 亚里士多德 隐喻 认知 Aristotle Metaphor Cognitiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1JOHN T KIRBY. Aristotle on metaphor[ J]. The American Journal of Philology, 1977, 118 (4) :517 -554.
  • 2JAMES EDWIN MAHON. Getting your sources right: What Aristotle didn't say[ G]//Researching and Applying Metaphor. 上海:上海外语教育出版社,2001.
  • 3魏耀章.二千年误解的消解——对古典隐喻理论的再认识[J].西北师大学报(社会科学版),2007,44(2):99-103. 被引量:4
  • 4茨维坦·托多罗夫.象征理论[M].王国卿,译.北京:商务印书馆.2004.
  • 5特伦斯·霍克斯.论隐喻[M].高丙中,译.北京:昆仑出版社,1992.
  • 6贝内戴托·克罗齐.作为表现的科学和一般语言学的美学的历史[M].王天清,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1984:264.
  • 7GEORGE LAKOFF, MARK JOHNSON. Metaphors We Live by[ M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press,2003.
  • 8GEORGE LAKOFF, MARK JOHNSON. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Westem Thought[ M]. New York : Basic Books, 1999.
  • 9ROMERO E, SORIA B. Cognitive metaphor theory revisited [ J ]. Journal of literary semantics, 2005,34 ( 1 ) : 1 - 33.
  • 10亚里士多德.修辞学[M].罗念生,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2006;348.

二级参考文献31

  • 1戴炜栋 何兆熊 华钧.简明英语语言学教程[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,1998.20-32.
  • 2林书武.隐喻研究的基本现状、焦点及趋势[A].束定芳.语言的认知研究:认知语言学论文精选[C].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2004:442-456.
  • 3Golden,L.& Hardison.Aristotle's Poetics:A Translation and Commentary for Students of Literature[M].Prentice Hall,Inc.Englewood Cliffs,N.J.,1987.
  • 4Halliwell,S.The Poetics of Aristotle:Translation and Commentary[M].Chapel Hill:The University of North Carolina Press,1987.
  • 5Kennedy,A.Aristotle on Rhetoric:A Theory of Civic Discourse[M].Oxford University Press,1991.
  • 6Harris,R.& T.Taylor.Landmarks in Linguistic Thought:The Western Tradition from Socrates to Saussure[M].London and New York:Routledge,1989,20.
  • 7Mahon,J.Getting your sources right[A].In Cameron & Low (eds.),Researching and Applying Metaphor[C].ShangHai Foreign Education Press,2001:69-80.
  • 8Martinich.A.The Philosophy of Language[M].New York:Oxford University Press,1990:413.
  • 9Richards,A.The Philosophy of Rhetoric[M].New York:Oxford University Press,1965.
  • 10Kittay,E.Metaphor:Its Cognitive Force and Linguistic Structure[M].Oxford:Clarendon Press,1989.

共引文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部