期刊文献+

3个甘蔗与斑茅远缘杂交后代BC_1的染色体遗传分析 被引量:7

Genetic Analysis of Chromosome in 3 BC_1 Clones from the Distant Crossing Between Saccharum spp.and Erianthus arundinaceus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对3个甘蔗与斑茅远缘杂交后代BC1进行真实性鉴定及染色体核型分析,以探讨甘蔗与斑茅BC1的染色体传递方式。利用2对鉴定斑茅真实杂交后代的特异引物对3个甘蔗与斑茅BC1进行鉴定,采用根尖分生区细胞去壁低渗涂片法制片,显微拍照计数染色体数目,并进行染色体核型分析。3个BC1材料均为斑茅的真实杂交后代,崖城01-69体细胞染色体核型公式为2n=121=120 m+1 sm,其染色体按2n+n方式传递;崖城01-116的体细胞染色体核型公式为2n=122=118 m+4 sm,其染色体传递方式为2n+n;崖城01-134的体细胞染色体核型公式为2n=121=120 m+1 sm,其染色体传递为2n+n。推断甘蔗与斑茅BC1的染色体以2n+n的方式传递。 To explore the chromosome transmission, the karyotypes of 3 BC1 clones from the distant crossing between Saccharum spp. and Erianthus arundinaceus were analyzed. 3 BC1 clones were identified using 2 pairs of specific primers of true E. arundinaceus progenies. Chromosomes were prepared according to cell wall degradation hypotonic smear method, the chromosomes number of 3 BC1 clones was calculated and the karyotypes of 3 BCI clones were analyzed. 3 BC1 clones were true progenies of E. arundinaceus. The somatic chromosome karyotypic type of YC01-69 was 2n=121=120 m+1 sm, following 2n+n transmission; The somatic chromosome karyotypic type of YC01-116 was 2n=122=118 m+4 sin, following 2n+n transmission; The somatic chromosome karyotypic type of YC01-134 was 2n=121=120 m+l sin, following 2n+n transmission. The 2n+n transmission of BC1 clones from Saccharum spp. and E. arundinaceus can be resumed.
出处 《热带作物学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第1期53-58,共6页 Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops
基金 国家自然科学基金(No.30671329) 国家甘蔗产业体系专项资金资助(No.CARS-20-1-5)
关键词 甘蔗 斑茅 核型分析 染色体传递方式 Sugarcane Erianthus arundinaceus Karyotype analysis Chromosome transmission
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1张跃彬,吴才文,刘家勇,赵俊.现代甘蔗产业技术国内外发展状况及建议[J].中国糖料,2008,30(4):54-57. 被引量:18
  • 2World Sugar Statistics F 0. Lichtes world sugar year book. 72ndedn[M]. Informa, 2011.
  • 3Lu Y h, D'hont A, Walker Dit, et al. Relationships amongancestral species of sugarcane revealed with RFLP using singlecopy maize nuclear probes[J]. Euphytica, 1994, 78(1-2): 7-18.
  • 4Irvine J R Saccharum species as horticultural classes[Jj. Theoreticaland Applied Genetics’ 1999, 98(2): 186-194.
  • 5Singh R K, Singh R B, Singh S P, et al. Identification ofsugarcane microsatellites associated to sugar content in sugarcaneand transferability to other cereal genomes[J]. Euphytica, 2011, 182(3): 335-354.
  • 6Amalraj V Alfonse, Balasundaram N. On the taxonomy of themembers of ‘ Saccharum complex ’ [J]. Genetic Resources andCrop Evolution, 2006, 53(1): 35-41.
  • 7D'hont A, Rao P S, Feldmann P, et al. Identification andcharacterisation of sugarcane intergeneric hybrids, Saccharumofficinarum x Erianthus arundinaceus,with molecular markersand DNA in situ hybridisation[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics,1995, 91(2): 320-326.
  • 8Rott P,Mohamed I S, Klett P, et al. Resistance to leaf scalddisease is associated with limited colonization of sugarcane and1997,87 (12): 1202-1213.
  • 9Piperidis G, Christopher M J, Carroll B J,et al. Molecularcontribution to selection of intergeneric hybrids between sugarcaneand the wild species Erianthjis anmdinaceus[J]. Genome, 2000 , 43(6): 1 033-1 037.
  • 10Ram Bakshi, Sreenivasan T V, Sahi B K, et al. Introgressionof low temperature tolerance and red rot resistance from Erianthusin sugarcane[J]. Euphytica, 2001, 122(1) : 145-153.

二级参考文献87

共引文献179

同被引文献107

引证文献7

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部