摘要
宋蔡絛所著《西清诗话》与陈严肖所著《庚溪诗话》中均有苏东坡评曾肇《扈跸诗》的记载,但二者对于苏轼的评价却有着截然不同的解读——前者认为苏轼此论重在批评曾肇诗用韵险僻,故谓其"唱首多辣气";后者却举《离骚》之例,认为曾肇此诗虽押险韵,却"可谓工矣";同时认为东坡为人"慷慨嫉恶",断然不肯"效闾阎以鄙语相詈",并认为蔡论是对苏轼的污蔑,是"误后人心术"之论。本文从分析上述二者大相径庭的论点入手,在结合相关材料对其中所表现的作者倾向性进行分析和论述,并进一步分析二者产生分歧的原因。
Both Cai Tao＇ s XiQingShiHua and Chen Yanxiao＇ s GengXiShiHua are involves in Su Shi＇ s comments about Zeng Zhao＇ s HuBi, but their interpretations for this comment are at the opposite poles. The former one holds that Su Shi＇ s comment is about criticism on the delicate poem＇ s rhyme while the latter holds that his comment on rhyme is about being technical. According to analysis on the relative information, we can understand the reason why they have different opinions and why we should pay more attention to the historical contexts.
出处
《齐齐哈尔大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2015年第1期100-103,共4页
Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
关键词
诗押险韵
苏评
辣气
倾向性
原因
Shiyaxianyun
comment on Su Shi
Laqi
tendency
reason
