期刊文献+

Cage加椎弓根螺钉固定治疗腰椎滑脱症的临床疗效

Cage Pedicle Screw Fixation for the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价后路减压固定加椎间cage融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症的临床疗效。方法:自2009年3月-2013年6月应用椎间cage加椎弓根螺钉固定技术治疗腰椎滑脱症患者22例,其中男13例,女9例,年龄41-67岁,平均48岁。其中Ⅰ度滑脱14例,Ⅱ度滑脱7例,Ⅲ度滑脱1例。对所有患者术后随访3个月-32个月,平均28个月。结果:所有滑脱基本复位,融合率100%,椎体间高度恢复,症状明显改善, cage位置正常,椎弓根螺钉无松动及断裂。根据邹德威等评分标准,优良率达95.46%。结论:采用cage加椎弓根螺钉固定治疗腰椎滑脱症临床效果好、安全,椎间融合率高,内固定物无断裂、松动,是较为理想的手术方法之一。 Objective:To research the clinical efficacy of posterior decompression and interbody cage fusion in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.Methods:From march 2009 to june 2013,I applied interbody fusion and pedicle screw in the treatment of 22 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis, including 13 males and 9 females, aged 41-67 years, mean 48years old, type I spondylolisthesis 14cases t,ype II spondylolisthesis 7 cases, and III spondylolisthesis patients. All patients were followed up for 3 months to 32months , with an average of 28 months.Results:All the cases slippage were reseted. ,the fusion rate was 100%, the vertebral height and symptoms after operation improved significantly, the cage remain the normal position and the pedicle screw not be loosening and fracture. The excellent rate is 95.46%, ac-cording to the Zou Dewei rating criteria. Conclusion:The fixation with cage and pedicle screw in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis is one of the good methods have the advantages of more safety , interbody fusion rate fixation , without fracture and loosening.
出处 《中国伤残医学》 2015年第3期2-3,共2页 Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
关键词 腰椎滑脱症 CAGE 椎弓根螺钉 Lumbar spondylolisthesis Cage Pedicle screws
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献64

  • 1邹德威,海涌,马华松,吴航滨,邵水霖,白克文,陈晓明.重度腰椎滑脱的治疗[J].中华骨科杂志,1998,18(5):259-262. 被引量:358
  • 2倪松,杨华,卓小为.椎弓根螺钉复位固定系统治疗腰椎滑脱23例[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2005,19(9):763-764. 被引量:6
  • 3张功林,葛宝丰,曾述强,张军华,苗国安,陈新,王世勇,蔡卫东.胸腰椎稳定性重建方法的改进[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,1997,11(3):157-160. 被引量:2
  • 4[1]Hasegawa K,Ikeda M,Washio T,et al.An experimental study of porcine lumbar segmental stiffness by the distract-compression principle using a threaded interbody cage[J].J spinal Disord 2000,13(3):247~525.
  • 5[2]Zhao J,Hai Y,Ordway NR,et al.Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using posterolateral placement of a single cylindrical threaded cage[J].Spine,2000,25(4):425~430.
  • 6[3]Humpherys SC,Hodges SD,Patwardhan AG,et al.Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion[J].Spine, 2001,26(5):567~571.
  • 7[4]Rosenberg WS,Mummaneni PV.Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:technique,complication,and early results[J].Neurosurg,2001,48(3):569~574;discussion 574~575.
  • 8[5]Zdeblick TA,David SM.A prospective comparison of surgical approach for anterior L4~L5 fusion:laparoscopic versus mini anterior lumbar interbody fusion[J].Spine,2000,25(20):2682~2687.
  • 9[6]Mulholland RC.Cages:outcome and complications[J].Eur Spine J,2000,9 Supp11:s110~113.
  • 10[7]Matge G,Leclercq TA.Rationale for interbody fusion with threaded titanium cages at cervical and lumbar levels.Results on 357 cases[J].Acta Neurochir(Wien),2000,142(4):425~33;discussion 434.

共引文献137

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部