期刊文献+

三种微创技术联合治疗复杂性输尿管上段结石的临床研究 被引量:5

Clinical study of three minimally invasive therapies for complicated upper ureteral calculi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨复杂性输尿管上段结石的最佳治疗方法。方法对68例复杂性输尿管上段结石患者行三种微创技术联合治疗。结果33例患者行输尿管镜或联合经皮肾镜碎石取石术(MPCNL)和后腹腔镜下输尿管切开取石术(RLU)治疗后,术中取尽结石率为90.9%(30/33)。11例患者行 MPCNL 或联合经尿道输尿管镜碎石取石术(URL)和 RLU 治疗后,术中取尽结石率为100%。24例行腹腔镜切开取石术(RLU),术中取尽结石率为100%。手术均获成功,无严重并发症发生。结论对于复杂性输尿管上段结石的微创治疗,应根据临床情况制定多种个性化治疗方案。 Objective To investigate the best therapy of complicated upper ureteral calculi. Methods A total of 68 patients with complicated upper ureteral calculi underwent combined three mini-mally invasive therapies.Results In the 33 cases selected for ureteroscopy or combined minimally inva-sive percutaneous nephrolithotomy(MPCNL)and retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy(RLU),the stone-free rate was 90.9%(30 /33).In the 11 cases selected for MPCNL or combined ureteroscopic litho-tripsy(URL)and RLU,the stone-free rate was 100%.In the 24 cases selected for RLU,the stone-free rate was 100%.All the patients had successful operations without serious complications.Conclusion In the treatment of complicated upper ureteral calculi,multiple individual therapies should be considered accord-ing to the clinical condition.
出处 《临床外科杂志》 2014年第11期805-807,共3页 Journal of Clinical Surgery
关键词 复杂性输尿管上段结石 微创治疗 complicated upper ureteral calculi minimally invasive therap
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献21

  • 1李逊,雷鸣,袁坚,曾国华,单炽昌,郭彬,陈文忠,刘冠昭.微创经皮肾穿刺取石和经尿道输尿管镜碎石治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石的疗效比较[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2004,19(7):388-390. 被引量:234
  • 2王谷丰,王炜,蒋国华,温洪波,甄旭彦,李建勇.微创治疗输尿管上段结石258例报告[J].中国微创外科杂志,2006,6(5):372-373. 被引量:21
  • 3Daniel J, Painter, Francis X, et al. New concepts in the treatment of ureteral calculi. Current Opinion in Urology,2001, 11: 373-378.
  • 4Park H, Park M, Park T. Two year experience with ureteral stones: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy vs ureteroscopic manipulation. J Endourol, 1998, 12:501-504.
  • 5Kumar V, Ahlawat R, Banjeree G K, et al. Percutaneous ureterolitholapaxy: the best bet to clear large bulk impacted upper ureteral calculi. Arch Esp Urol, 1996,49: 86-91.
  • 6Jackman S V,Docimo S G, Cadeddu J A, et al. The mini-pere' technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol, 1998,16 : 371-374.
  • 7Lahme S,Bichler K H,Strohmaire W H, et al. Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones. Eur Urol, 2001, 40:619-624.
  • 8Maheshwar P N, Oswal A T, Andankar M, et al. Is antegrade ureteroscopy better than retrograde ureteroscopy for impacted large upper ureteral calculi? J Endourol, 1999, 13: 441-444.
  • 9Devarajan R, Ashraf M, Beck R O, et al. Holmium:YAG lasertripsy for ureteric calculi: an experience of 300 procedures. Br J Urol,1998,82:342-347.
  • 10Parker B D, Frederick R W, Reilly T P, et al. Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser[J]. Urology, 2004, 64: 1102-1106.

共引文献409

同被引文献33

引证文献5

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部