期刊文献+

当代区域竞技体育发展效率及影响因素研究 被引量:7

Regional Competitive Sports Efficiency and Influencing Factors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在众多因素对地区竞技体育发展水平制约的情况下,提高竞技体育发展效率是其发展过程中的又一重要内容。选取基于投入导向的DEA,及采用Tobit回归模型,对当今30个竞技体育强国在2000-2012年的发展效率与影响因素进行研究。研究结果表明,世界竞技体育强国间的综合技术效率差距总体呈扩大趋势,技术相对有效的国家数量逐年上升。在区域竞技体育发展效率的比较中,非洲与太平洋地区的效率变异性最低,其中非洲地区的效率呈绝对收敛现象。在影响竞技体育发展效率的因素研究中,竞技体育后备人才淘汰率、优秀教练员与奥运参赛项目数之比、优秀运动员的平均训练年限是影响竞技体育发展效率的主要因素。 Improving the efficiency has been an important consideration for the development of competitive sport, which is restricted by various factors. Based on the models of input-oriented DEA and Tobit regression,the present study looked at the development efficiency and its influencing factors of 30 competitive sport powers during 2000 2012. The results are as follows. The gap of the technical efficiency was widening,and the number of countries with relative technical efficiency was on a year-on-year rise. Inter-regionally,the lowest efficiency variance was found to be in Africa and the Pacific Region,with efficiency in Africa being absolutely convergent. The main factors influen-cing the development efficiency of competitive sport included the fallout rate of the backup talents,the ratio of the number of excellent coaches to that of the events they participate and the average training time span of the elite ath-letes.
作者 傅佳 江广和
出处 《南京体育学院学报(社会科学版)》 2014年第6期112-119,125,共9页 Journal of Nanjing Institute of Physical Education
基金 西安体育学院2012年院管课题(编号:2012YB006) 陕西省教育厅2012年科学研究项目(编号:12JK1081)
关键词 竞技体育 技术效率 DEA 收敛 competitive sports technical efficiency DEA convergence
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1伯纳德,布斯.经济决定奥运奖牌数[J].三联生活周刊,2004(35):28-29.
  • 2约翰.梅纳德.凯恩斯.就业、信息和货币通论[M].北京:商务印书馆,2008:125-135.
  • 3S Lozano, G Villa, F Guerrero, P Corts. Measuring thePerformance of Nations at the Summer Olympics Using DataEnvelopmentAnalysis [J]. Journal of the Operational Re-search Society, 2002 ( 53 ) : 501 -511.
  • 4Soares deMello, J C C B, Gomes E G, AnguloMeza L, BiondiNeto L, Coelho PH G. AModified DEAModel forO-lympic Evaluation [C]. Proceed- ings of the XII Congreso La-tino-Iberoamericano de Investigacin Operativa-CLAIO ,2004, LaHabana.
  • 5LinsMPE, GomesEG, Soares deMello JCCB, Soares de Mello AJR. Olympics Ranking Based on a Zero Sum Gains DEAModel [J]. European Journal of OperationalResearch ,2003,148:312 - 322.
  • 6Churilov L, Flitaman A. Towards FairRanking of Olym-pics Achievements:the Case of Sydney 2000 [J]. Computers and OperationsResearch, 2006 (33) :2057-2982.
  • 7Hai H L. Using Vote-ranking and Cross-evaluation- Methods toAssess the Performance of Nations at the Olympics [J]. WSEAS Transactions on Systems, 2007,6(6): 1196 - 1205.
  • 8Wei Quanling. Effective methods on evaluating tel- ative efficiency (DEA) [J]. Chinese Science Bulle- tin ,2000,45 ( 17 ) :1973 - 1807.
  • 9方创琳,关兴良.中国城市群投入产出效率的综合测度与空间分异[J].地理学报,2011,66(8):1011-1022. 被引量:198
  • 10梁隆斌,张华.中国区域经济发展不平衡的收敛性研究——基于三次产业的视角[J].经济问题探索,2011(1):38-42. 被引量:9

二级参考文献106

共引文献417

同被引文献113

引证文献7

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部