摘要
刑法第四百三十八条第二款同样是特殊法条,将该款规定中的"处罚"解释为"定罪处罚"不具有正当性,军人盗窃、抢夺部队枪支、弹药、爆炸物的行为应认定为盗窃、抢夺武器装备罪。出于罪刑相适应的考虑,对上述行为量刑时应适用刑法第一百二十七条第二款的法定刑。从立法论角度来看,刑法第四百三十八条第二款的规定存在缺陷。对此,可经由补正解释的路径来纠正这一错误。
Paragraph 2 article 438 of the Criminal Law is also a special law. It is improper to interpret the word "punished" here as "convicted and punished". The action of an army man' s stealing or seizing firearms, ammuni- tion or explosives should be convicted as the crime of stealing or seizing weaponry. Considering the principle of suit- ing punishment to Crime, the sentencing should apply to paragraph 2 article 127 of the Criminal Law. There is a flaw in paragraph 2 article 438 from the legislative perspective, which can be corrected by amendable interpreta- tions.
出处
《河南警察学院学报》
2014年第6期99-102,共4页
Journal of Henan Police College
基金
国家社科基金青年项目"军职罪修改的体系化设计研究"(12CFX037)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
盗窃
抢夺武器装备罪
盗窃
抢夺枪支
弹药
爆炸物罪
补正解释
Crime of stealing or seizing weaponry
Crime of stealing or seizing firearms, ammunition or explosives
Amendable interpretation