期刊文献+

三江平原湿地面积减少的驱动因素分析 被引量:23

Driving Factors of Shrinkage of Wetlands in the Sanjing Plain
原文传递
导出
摘要 以1986-2010年三江平原湿地面积和6个潜在驱动因素的13个指标数据为基础数据,应用Tobit模型,分析各驱动因素对湿地面积的影响。研究结果表明,导致湿地面积减少的是人口总量增加、城市化率增大、农村居民人均纯收入提高、耕地面积增加和居民地面积增加。 Driving factors analysis that cause ecosystem change is essential to the design of environmental interventions which could enhance the positive responses and minimize the negative impacts.The Wetlands in the Sanjiang Plain has witnessed a severe shrinkage during the past 60 years.As a consequence,some ecological and environmental issues become increasingly apparent such as the loss of biodiversity,the frequent floods,and the degradation of regulating functions,etc.The shrinkage of the wetlands in the Sanjiang Plain is affected by many driving factors,so recognizing the complicated relationship between them is very insignificant.In this article,the evolution process of the wetlands in the Sanjiang Plain was reviewed;and some qualitative analyses were conducted by the Tobit model to study the impact effects of 6 indicators of 13 possible driving factors on the shrinkage of the wetlands.The results showed that 5 indicators(the total population,the urbanization rate,the rural per capita net income,the cultivated area and the residential area) from 6 possible driving factors(population,economy and land use driving factors) had significant effects on the area of the wetlands.The increase of number of total population,higher urbanization rate,increase of rural per capita net income,increase of the cultivated area and residential area led to the shrinkage of the wetlands in the Sanjiang Plain.
出处 《湿地科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第6期766-771,共6页 Wetland Science
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2009CB421103)资助
关键词 湿地面积 萎缩 驱动因素 TOBIT模型 三江平原 area of wetlands shrinkage driving factor Tobit model the Sanjiang Plain
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Stem D. Progress on the environmental Kuznets curve?[J]. Envi- ronment and Development Economics, 1998, 3(2): 173-196.
  • 2Waggoner P, Ausubel J. A framework for sustainability science: A renovated IPAT identity[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2002, 99(12): 7 860-7 865.
  • 3Barbier B. Links between economic liberalization and rural re- source degradation in the developing regions[J]. Agricultural eco- nomics, 2000, 23(3): 299-310.
  • 4Rounsevell M, Dawson T, Harrison P. A conceptual framework to assess the effects of environmental change on ecosystem services [J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2010, 19(10): 2 823 -2 842.
  • 5Svarstad H, Petersen L, Rothman D, et al. Discursive biases of the environmental research framework DPSIR[J]. Land Use Poli- cy, 2008, 25(1):116-125.
  • 6Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems Services and Human Well-being: wetlands and water synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington D C, 2005.
  • 7Lubowski R, Plantinga A, Stavins R. What drives land-use change in the United States? A national analysis of landowner de- cisions[J]. Land Economics, 2008, 84(4): 529-550.
  • 8Laurance S, Baider C, Vincent Florens F, et al. Drivers of wetland disturbance and biodiversity impacts on a tropical oceanic island [J]. Biological Conservation, 2012, 149(1): 136-142.
  • 9李颖,田竹君,叶宝莹,张养贞.嫩江下游沼泽湿地变化的驱动力分析[J].地理科学,2003,23(6):686-691. 被引量:29
  • 10Nelson G, Bennett E, Berhe A, et al. Anthropogenic drivers of ecosystem change: an overview[J]. Ecology and Society, 11(2): 29.

二级参考文献151

共引文献992

同被引文献385

引证文献23

二级引证文献128

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部