摘要
目的规范应用国际原子量表给出的量值信息。方法通过比较《中国药典》附录原子量表与IUPAC原子量末位括号内数值的含义,比较其差异。结果 IUPAC推荐该数值的原意代表不确定度,在《中国药典》中注释为准确度,二者不可替代。结论建议使用IUPAC推荐的原子量表中各相应数值的含义。
Objective To apply legitimately values given in the table of atomic weights.Methods The meanings of the last significant digit of relative atomic mass was discoursed by comparing the footnotes in Chinese Pharmacopoeia and USP-NF with IUPAC technical reporters.Results It was deemed that there was difference between accuracy in Ch.P.and uncertainty in IUPAC.The conception of"accuracy"in Ch.P.should not be expressed as quantity,but as of uncertainty according to IUPAC.Conclusion It is suggested that the annotations of table of Standard Atomic Weights recommended by IUPAC be used
出处
《中国药事》
CAS
2014年第12期1342-1343,共2页
Chinese Pharmaceutical Affairs
关键词
相对原子质量
不确定度
中国药典
准确度
relative atomic mass
uncertainty
Chinese Pharmacopoeia
accuracy