期刊文献+

Development of Implicit and Explicit Knowledge of Grammatical Structures in Chinese EFL Learners 被引量:2

Development of Implicit and Explicit Knowledge of Grammatical Structures in Chinese EFL Learners
原文传递
导出
摘要 Although the theoretical distinction between implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language has long been recognized,minimal documented description exists of the development of the two types of knowledge in L2 learners due to the difficulty in finding separate measures of the two types.To address this gap,this study first investigated the construct validity of the four tests developed by R.Ellis(2005)intended to distinguish between the two knowledge types:anoral imitation test,a timed grammaticality judgment test(G J T),an untimed GJ T and a metalinguistic knowledge test.The four tests,all examining 17 English grammatical structures,were administered to 88 native speakers of Chinese studying English as their major at the first three year levels in a Chinese university.The results from a confirmatory factor analy sis(CFA)confirmed the two-factor solution for the implicit/explicit model proposed in R.Ellis(2005).Repeated measures ANOVA was then used to reveal develop mental trends of the two knowledge types in the EFL learners across the three y ear levels.The results showed that learners at higher year level(or higher proficiency level)generally had higher level of both implicit and explicit knowledge of grammatical structures,and overall,the Chinese EFL learners possessed hig her level of exp licit knowledge than implicit knowledge.With regard to individual grammatical structures,the results of this study confirmed R.Ellis(2006b)finding that the level of difficulty of grammatical structures varied according to whether it was implicit or explicit knowledge of the structures involved. Although the theoretical distinction between implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language has long been recognized, minimal documented description exists of the development of the two types of knowledge in L2 learners due to the difficulty in finding separate measures of the two types. To address this gap, this study first investigated the construct validity of the four tests developed by R. Ellis (2005) intended to distinguish between the two knowledge types: an oral imitation test, a timed grammaticality judgment test (GJT), an untimed GJT and a metalinguistic knowledge test. The four tests, all examining 17 English grammatical structures, were administered to 88 native speakers of Chinese studying English as their major at the first three year levels in a Chinese university. The results from a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed the two-factor solution for the implicit/explicit model proposed in R. Ellis (2005). Repeated measures ANOVA was then used to reveal developmental trends of the two knowledge types in the EFL learners across the three year levels. The results showed that learners at higher year level (or higher proficiency level) generally had higher level of beth implicit and explicit knowledge of grammatical structures, and overall, the Chinese EFL learners possessed higher level of explicit knowledge than implicit knowledge. With regard to individual grammatical structures, the results of this study confirmed R. Ellis' (2006b) finding that the level of difficulty of grammatical structures varied according to whether it was implicit or explicit knowledge of the structures involved.
出处 《当代外语研究》 2014年第12期32-47,共16页 Contemporary Foreign Language Studies
基金 supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (1 0BYY035 ) National Research Centre for FL Education Foundation (Z GWY J Y JJ 2010A30)
关键词 英语学习 学习方法 阅读知识 阅读材料 implicit knowledge, explicit knowledge, grammatical structure, L2 development, Chinese learners of English
  • 相关文献

参考文献57

  • 1Abdi, H. (2007). Bonferroni and Siddk corrections for multiple comparisons. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), F:cyclopedia of measurement and statistics ( pp. 103-107 ). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • 2Alderson, J. C., Clapham, C., &Steel, D. (1997). Metalinguistic knowledge, language aptitude and language proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 1, 93-121.
  • 3Arbuckle, J. (2004). AMOS 5. O. Chicago: Small Waters Corporation. Bachman, L. F. (2004). Statistical analysis for language assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 4Bialystok, E. (1978). A theoretical model of second language learning. Language Learning, 28(1 ), 69-84.
  • 5Bialystok, E. (1979). Explicit and implicit judgements of L2 grammaticality. Language Learning, 29, 81-103.
  • 6Brown, J. D. (2005). Testing in langucu3e programs: A comprehensive guide to English language assessment (New ed. ). New York: McGraw-Hill College.
  • 7Butler, Y. (2002). Second language learners' theories on the use of English articles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 451-480.
  • 8Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic c:ncepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • 9Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in Structural Equation Models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36 ( 4 ), 462- 494.
  • 10DeKeyser, R. M. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 379-410.

同被引文献6

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部