期刊文献+

开放科学的动机:基于两部门科学家的实证研究 被引量:15

The motivations of open science: an empirical measuring for academic and industrial scientists
原文传递
导出
摘要 开放科学是创新者对知识的开放披露行为,它可以促进知识的开放与共享,有利于提高创新的社会福利。开放科学行为普遍存在于学术与产业部门,它具有"科学-商业"二元价值观。基于这种观点,本研究对科学家开放科学的动机进行了全新的解释,构建了"职业-产权-地位-经济"四维动机的理论框架。并通过对两部门883名科学家的实证测量,验证了理论框架的合理性,找出了两部门科学家开放科学动机的差异性,并为政策制定者和企业管理者提供了重要的启示。 Open science is innovators open knowledge disclosure behavior,it can promote openness and sharing of knowledge,and improve social welfare of innovation.Open science universal exist in academic and industrial sectors,it has ‘ science-business’ dual value.This study provides a new explanation for scientists' s motivations,and builds a theoretical framework from‘ career-property status-economic’ motivations perspective.Using survey data from 883 academic and industrial scientists,we examine the rationality of theoretical framework,and find the differences between academic and industrial scientists in open science motivation.Our findings have important implications for innovation research as well as for policy makers and managers.
作者 张学文
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第11期1620-1629,1722,共11页 Studies in Science of Science
基金 国家社科基金青年项目(11CGL039) 河北省自然科学基金项目(G2014205139) 河北师范大学自然科学基金重点项目(L2012Z10)
关键词 开放科学 动机 学术科学家 产业科学家 科学偏好 open science motivation academic scientists industrial scientists taste for science
  • 相关文献

参考文献46

  • 1张学文.面向创新型国家的开放科学技术政策——理论内涵及建构逻辑与社会效应[J].科学学研究,2013,31(10):1488-1494. 被引量:15
  • 2Aghion P,David P A,Foray D.Science,technology and innovation for economic growth:linking policy research and practice in STIG systems[J].Research Policy,2009,38(4):681-693.
  • 3Nelson R R.The market economy and the scientific commons[J].Research Policy,2004,33(3):455-471.
  • 4David P.Can‘open science’be protected from the evolving regime of intellectual property rights protections[J].Journal of Theoretical and Institutional Economics,2004,160:1-26.
  • 5Von Hippel E,von Krogh G.Free revealing and the private-collective model for innovation incentives[J].R&D management,2006,36:295-306.
  • 6Cohen W,Walsh J.Real impediments to academic research[J].Innovation Policy and the Economy,2008(8):1-30.
  • 7Couzin-Frankel G J.Plagiarism sleuths[J].Science,2009,324:1004-1007.
  • 8Kornhauser W.Scientists in Industry:Conflict and Accommodation[M].Berkeley:University of California Press,1962.
  • 9Miller G A.Professionals in bureaucracy:alienation among industrial scien-tists and engineers[J].American Sociological Review,1967,32(5):755-768.
  • 10Penin J.Open knowledge disclosure:An overview of the evidence and economic motivations[J].Journal of Economic Surveys,2007,21(2):326-347.

二级参考文献83

  • 1连燕华.技术创新政策的分析框架[J].科学管理研究,1999,17(3):4-7. 被引量:9
  • 2邢怀滨,苏竣.均衡与演化框架下的技术政策比较[J].科学学研究,2004,22(5):488-492. 被引量:19
  • 3Bryant K.促进创新:就演化经济学和系统研究方法应用于政策问题的一种总的看法[A].Foster,Metecalfe.演化经济学前沿[C].高等教育出版社,2005.
  • 4Merton, R. K. : The normative structure of science[C]. In The Sociology of Science : Theoretical and Empirical Investigations[ M]. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press, 1973 :267 - 278.
  • 5Weitzman, M. L. :Recombinant growth[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113 (2), 1998 : 331 - 360.
  • 6Fudenberg, F. and E. Maskin: The folk theorem in repeatedgames with discounting and incomplete information [ J ]. Econometrics, 54, 1984:533-554.
  • 7Coase, R. H. : The institutional structures of production[ R], Nobel lecture, 1991.
  • 8盛洪,陈郁译.论生产的制度结构[C].上海三联书店,1994:350—362.
  • 9North, D. C. : Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance[ M]. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  • 10Merton, R. K. : The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations [ M ]. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press, 1973.

共引文献29

同被引文献257

引证文献15

二级引证文献119

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部