期刊文献+

后发企业全球研发系统架构的设计规则——基于多案例比较的研发“走出去”过程研究 被引量:7

Design rules of latecomer firms' global R&D system architecture:a process research of R&D going out based on multiple case comparison analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 研发走出去已成为中国企业技术追赶的重要战略选择。建立面向全球的跨边界研发系统,需要协调好组织内外部的网络关系,合理设计其架构构建路径和方式。本文基于架构理论视角,通过探索性的多案例研究,分析在技术差距和制度差距的影响下,实施研发走出去战略的后发企业应当如何设计并建立组织架构和技术架构,从而获得全球研发系统构建与完善的最优解。根据案例研究结果,本文归纳了四种不同的技术架构和组织架构的模块性实现路径,深入探讨了目标选择、系统组建步骤和协调策略三个方面的全球研发系统构建的设计规则,为进行技术追赶的中国企业提供理论参考与实践启示。 R&D going out has already become a vital strategy for Chinese firms to realize technology catching-up.In order to establish a global R&D system,latecomer enterprises must coordinate multiple relationships between internal and external network,then design appropriate paths and approaches of conducting architecture.Based on the perspective of architecture theory,this paper used multiple case studies and cross-case comparison to analyze that,under the influence of technological gap and institutional gap,how enterprises should design and construct technological and organizational architecture,then to find out the optimal path to establish and consummate global R&D system.Based on case studies,this paper generalized different types of paths of technological and organizational architec ture building,analyzed the matching and interaction mechanisms between them,and then discussed the design rules of strategy choice,constructing procedure and coordinating technique during R&D going out,in order to provide practical guidance and enlightenment for Chinese enterprises.
作者 魏江 黄学
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第11期1668-1678,共11页 Studies in Science of Science
基金 新世纪优秀人才支持计划资助(NCET) 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71072112) 浙江省自然科学基金杰出青年项目(R6110132)
关键词 架构 研发系统 技术差距 制度差距 模块性 architecture R&D system technological gap institutional gap modularity
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1吕萍,杨震宁,王以华.我国高新技术企业研发国际化的发展与现状[J].中国软科学,2008(4):109-116. 被引量:32
  • 2Asakawa K,Lehrer M.Managing local knowledge assets globally:the role of regional innovation relays[J].Journal of World Business,2003,38(1):31-42.
  • 3Lu J W,Beamish P W.International diversification and firm performance:the S-curve hypothesis[J].Academy of Management Journal,2004,47(4):598-609.
  • 4Manolova T S,Manev I M,Gyoshev B S.In good company:the role of personal and inter-firm networks for new-venture internationalization in a transition economy[J].Journal of World Business,2010,45(3):257-265.
  • 5Sturgeon T J.Modular production networks:a new American model of industrial organization[J].Industrial and Corporate Change,2002,11(3):451-496.
  • 6Brusoni S,Prencipe A.Making design rules:a multidomain perspective[J].Organization Science,2006,17(2):179-189.
  • 7Luo J,Baldwin C Y,Whitney D E,et al.The architecture of transaction networks:a comparative analysis of hierarchy in two sectors[J].Industrial and Corporate Change,2012,21(6):1307-1335.
  • 8Baldwin C Y.Where do transactions come from?Modularity,transactions,and the boundaries of firms[J].Industrial and Corporate Change,2008,17(1):155-195.
  • 9Crawley E,Weck O D,Eppinger S,et al.The influence of architecture in engineering systems[R].Boston:MIT Engineering Systems Division,2004.
  • 10刘洋,应瑛.架构理论研究脉络梳理与未来展望[J].外国经济与管理,2012,34(6):74-80. 被引量:21

二级参考文献41

  • 1胡峰.论国际研发投资中的东道国投资促进政策的选择[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,28(4):46-50. 被引量:3
  • 2Agarwal R, et al. Spillovers across organizational architec- tures:The role of prior resource allocation and communication in post-acquisition coordination outcomes[J]. Strategic Mana- gement Journal, 2012,33(6) : 710-733.
  • 3Baldwin C and Clark K. Managing in an age of modularity[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1997,75 (5) : 84- 93.
  • 4Boumgarden P, et al. Sailing into the wind: Exploring the rela- tionships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2012,33 (6) : 587-610.
  • 5Brusoni S, et al. Knowledge specialization, organizational cou- pling,and the boundaries o{ the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2001,46(4) :597-621.
  • 6Christensen C M,et al. Disruption, disintegration and the dis- sipation of differentiability[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,2002,11(5):955 -993.
  • 7Christensen C M,et al. Disruption, disintegration and the dis- sipation of differentiability[J].Industrial and Corporate Change,2002,11(5):955- 993.
  • 8Dietl H,et al. Value creation architectures and competitive ad- vantage: Lessons from the European automobile industry[J]. California Management Review, 2009,51 ( 3 ): 24 - 48.
  • 9Eom J. Modularity and technological change :A primer and synthesis[J]. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 2008, 16(2): 1-24.
  • 10Ethiraj S and Levinthal D. Bounded rationality and the search for organizational architecture:An evolutionary perspective on the design of organizations and their evolvability[J].Adminis trative Science Quarterly,2004,49(3) .-404-437.

共引文献51

同被引文献59

引证文献7

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部