期刊文献+

未成年人刑事案件不公开审判制度比较研究——基于特别隐私权的理论视角 被引量:4

A Comparative Study on Closed Trial System for Juvenile Defendants ——Based on the Theory of Juvenile Special Privacy Right
下载PDF
导出
摘要 未成年人刑事不公开审判,作为公开审判原则之例外原则,已在世界范围内得以普遍确立,但各国之间相关立法的具体规定存在不少差异。基于未成年人特别隐私权的理论视角,聚焦于未成年人刑事不公开审判的年龄时点、案件范围、判决宣告和媒体报道等争议问题,对中外各国的相关立法例进行比较研究,对于我国完善未成年人刑事案件不公开审判制度具有一定的参考和借鉴意义。 Closed trial for juvenile defendants is a kind of common legal system around the world, but the specific provisions varied from countries to countries. From the theoretical perspective of the juveniles' special right of privacy, focusing on the issues, such as the age time, the case scope, the judgment announcement and the mass media prohibition of the juvenile closed trial system. To do a comparative study between China and foreign countries can provide references and enlightments for the improvement of the PRC juvenile closed trial system.
出处 《天中学刊》 2015年第1期56-65,共10页 Journal of Tianzhong
关键词 未成年人刑事案件 不公开审判 特别隐私权 比较研究 价值权衡 juvenile criminal cases closed trial special privacy right comparative study value balance
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1李新刚.论隐私权限制的利益平衡原则[J].长春理工大学学报(社会科学版),2009,22(4):540-541. 被引量:2
  • 2[关]玛格丽特.K.罗森海姆,等.少年司法的一个世纪[M].高维俭,译.北京:商务印书馆,2008.
  • 3David S Tanenhaus, Steven A Drizin. "Owing to the Extreme Youth of the Accused": the Changing Legal Response to Juvenile Homicide[J]. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology. 2003. 92.
  • 4Lawrence B Solum. Procedural Justice[J]. Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series. Research Paper No. 04-02, 2004.
  • 5The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Access to Juvenile Courts: A Reporters Guide to Proceedings & Documents in the 50 States & D. C[R]. Spring 1999.
  • 6Thomas J Bernard, Megan C Kurlychek. The Cycle of Juvenile Justice(Second Edition)[M]. Oxford University Press, 2010.
  • 7Kristin N Henning. Eroding Confidentiality in Delinquency Proceedings: Should Schools and Public Housing Authorities Be Notified?[J]. New York Univeusuty Law Review, 2004, 79.
  • 8Elizabeth S Scott, Laurence Steinberg. Rethinking Juvenile Justice[M]. Massachusetts London: Harvard University Press Cambridge, 2008.
  • 9xx申请公开审理李XX案:让事实和证据说话[EB/0L].(2013-07-28)[2014-04-28].http://news.qq.corn/a/20130728/004322.htm.
  • 10亚里士多德.政治学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1985..

二级参考文献44

  • 1张新宝.信息技术的发展与隐私权保护[J].法制与社会发展,1996,2(5):16-25. 被引量:49
  • 2李新天,郑鸣.论中国公众人物隐私权的构建[J].中国法学,2005(5):93-101. 被引量:60
  • 3陈年冰.隐私权与公共利益的冲突及其调整[J].法制与社会发展,2006,12(4):144-149. 被引量:10
  • 4Federico del Giudice, Nuovo Dizionario Giuridico , Edizione Simone, Napoli, 1998 : 1196.
  • 5Mary Joy Quinn, Guardianships of Aduh : Achieving Justice, Autonomy, and Safty, Springer Publishing Company, Inc. 2005 : 19,19.
  • 6John Seymour, Patens Patriae and Wardship Powers: Their Nature and Origins, In Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 14, No. 2 (Summer, 1994):66,166,174,175,180,182,187.
  • 7Jay L. Himes, State Parens Patriae Authority : The Evolution of the State Attony General' s Authority, Miami, Aprile, 2004:2,2,3,7,12.
  • 8Amaldo Marcone, Stilicone "parens publicus ", In Zeitschrif far Papyrologie und Epigraphik, Bd. 70 (1987) :224,224,224.
  • 9[德]沃格林著.希腊化、罗马和早期基督教[M].谢华育译.华东师范大学出版社,2007:117.
  • 10Antonio de Puente y Franco y Jose Francisco Diaz, Historia de Leys , Plebiscitos y Senadoconsultas mas notables, Desde la Fundacion de la Roma hasta Justiniano, Imprenta de D. Vicente de Lalama, Madrid , 1840, pag. 19.

共引文献543

同被引文献17

  • 1孙莉.人本的过程性与权力运作过程的人本性[J].政法论坛,2007,25(1):129-140. 被引量:14
  • 2[美]理查德·C.托克音顿,阿丽塔·L.艾伦.美国隐私法:学说、判例与立法[M].冯建妹等.中国民主法制出版社,2004.42,62,48.
  • 3张民安.美国当代隐私权研究[M].中山大学出版社,2013.105,419,424.
  • 4David·M·Smolin.the Jurisprudence of Privacy in a Splintered Supreme Court,in Kermit L Hall,Conscience,Expression,and Privacy,p982.
  • 5Segura v.United States,468 U.S.796,810(1984).
  • 6Frederick Schauer.the Social Construction of Privacy,Discussion Draft 10(mar.20,2000).
  • 7[美]玛格丽特·K.罗森海姆等.少年司法的一个世纪[M].高维俭.商务印书馆,2008.70,175.
  • 8徐日丹,林中明.全国独立未成年人刑事检察工作机构达298个[N].检察日报,2012-05-24.
  • 9[美]路易斯·D.布兰代斯等.隐私权[M].宦盛奎.北京大学出版社,2014.91.
  • 10徐伯黎.一起引发"全民关注"的普通刑事案[N].检察日报,2013-11-20.

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部