期刊文献+

学术英语写作研究述评 被引量:63

A critical review of academic English writing studies
原文传递
导出
摘要 近四十年来,国内外学术英语写作研究总体上呈现三大路径:系统功能语言学视域下的学术英语写作研究、学术语言能力理论视域下的学术英语写作研究、对该领域自身理论范式的探讨。国外研究覆盖面广,进展主要表现在界定重要概念,创建与修正分析框架;考察的对象范围逐步详尽完整;研究视角从宏观走向具体深入。与国外研究相比,国内研究多关注学术文本特征,少关注写作者的认知过程。本文评析表明,该领域当前面临研究范式的接口问题,如何运用理论阐释数据的问题以及国内缺乏人本研究和跨学科创新研究的问题。 Academic English writing studies,both international and domestic,have been developing rapidly since 1980 sin three areas,i.e.,EAP writing studies with the approach of systemic functional linguistics,EAP writing studies with the approach of academic literacies,and reflections about research paradigms of the field per se.Covering all the three areas,the international studies have gained marked achievements,in particular,important concepts are defined,and analytical frameworks created and modified;agreater variety of research objects is investigated;and research foci are undergoing a shift from macro to specific.Compared with the international studies,the development of domestic research is behind for about nine years,with more focus on text but less on process.The field in general presents some problems related to the interface of research paradigms,application of theories to data analysis,and a lack of innovative studies domestically.
作者 徐昉
机构地区 南京大学
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期94-105,160-161,共12页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基金 国家社科基金项目“二语学术写作评价系统研究”(12BYY052)的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献46

  • 1Allison, D., L. Cooley, J. Lewkowicz & D. Nunan. 1998. Dissertation writing in action.- The development of a dissertation writing support program for ESL graduate research students [J]. English for Specific Purposes 17. 199-217.
  • 2Atkinson, D. 2004. Contrasting rhetorics/contrasting cultures.. Why contrastive rhetoric needs a better conceptualization of culture [J]. English for Specific Purposes 3 . 277-289.
  • 3Belcher, D. 2007. Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world [J]. Journal of Sec- ond Language Writing 16.. 1-22.
  • 4Biber, D. & F. Barbieri. 2007. Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers [J]. English for Specific Purposes 26 .. 263-286.
  • 5Casanave, C. 2003. Looking ahead to more sociopolitically-oriented case study research in L2 writing scholarship (But should it be called "post-process") [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 12. 85-102.
  • 6Charles, M. 2012. 'Proper vocabulary and juicy collocations' . EAP students eval*aate do-it- yourself corpus-building [J]. English for Specific Purposes 31 . 93-102.
  • 7Charles, M., D. Pecorari & S. Hunston (eds.). 2009. Academic Writing. At the Interface of Corpus and Discourse [C]. London. Continuum.
  • 8Cheng, A. 2006. Analyzing and enacting academic criticism. The case of an L2 graduate learner of academic writing [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 15. 279-306.
  • 9Cheng, A. 2008. Individualized engagement with genre in academic literacy tasks[J]. Eng- lish for Specific Purposes 27. 387-411.
  • 10Coffin, C. &J. Donohue. 2012. Academic literacics and systemic functional linguistics. How do they relate? [J]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11.64-75.

二级参考文献148

同被引文献666

引证文献63

二级引证文献202

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部