启蒙与现代的焦虑——以中医存废之争中的周作人为例

Enlightenment and Modern Anxiety

新派中人看似激进主义的立场实际上已经超越了单纯利害上的考量,而具有了政治和历史的意义。近代中国关于中西医论争的性质其实就是复古与现代两派的对立与决战。"不想拼命"的心理底线,最终还是被纳入复古与维新的框架来应对。周作人在中西医之争中始终如一的态度是他知识分子的拯救和启蒙立场的结果。面对来自权力的舆论箝制,周作人文学上的办法是言此而意彼的冷嘲热讽。1950年代后有关周作人的调整或再描述的行动与方式是当时改造中的知识分子重新确立个人与国家、个人与政治及革命关系的反映。

In fact, the forerunners have their own political and historical meaning beyond private profit. Zhou Zuoren thinks that the essense of controversy between Chinese medicine and the western medicine is the opposition of ancient and modern groups. Zhou makes decision within a frame work between the old and the new based on the psychological bottom line of life. Zhou＇s basic attitude is the outcome of the Enlightenment. Zhou sets up modern principle for human in order to overcome some difficulties. Zhou＇s way of literature is to use satire to implicate. Af- ter liberation, Zhou deliberately adapts himself to people and politics to harmonize with his environment.