期刊文献+

研发外包是否会抑制我国制造业自主创新能力? 被引量:39

Does R&D Outsourcing Inhibit Innovation Performance in Chinese Manufacturing?
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文利用2002年、2007年中国投入产出表和联合国贸发数据库中数据,测算历年我国制造业的研发外包率,随后利用2003~2011年制造业细分行业的面板数据,从创新能力和创新效率两个维度,考察了研发外包对我国自主创新能力的影响。实证结果显示:研发外包可以显著地促进我国制造业的创新能力和创新效率。研发外包每增加1%,将会促进制造业创新能力提高0.322%,创新效率改善0.0884%。从作用机制来看,研发外包对创新效率的正向作用主要体现在对纯技术进步率的提高上。本文进一步运用Hansen(1999)提出的门槛检验方法对研发外包创新提升效应的若干因素及其门槛特征进行检验,并从吸收能力和议价能力两个方面分析和筛选出适合开展研发外包的行业。本文的研究结论表明在后危机时代,研发外包是我国制造业提高创新能力,进而顺利完成转型升级任务的最佳选择。 In this paper, we not only utilize two input-output tables of 2002 and 2007, but also approach the data from UNCTAD database, then estimate the R&D outsourcing rate of China's manufacturing industry. In addition, we analyze the effect of R&D outsourcing on innovation capacity and innovation efficiency by manufacturing industry segments panel data from 2003 to 2011. The empirical results indicate that R&D outsourcing can significantly promote innovation capacity and innovation effi- ciency in manufacturing industry. When R&D outsourcing increase 1%, it will increase manufacturing innovation capacity by 0. 322% and improve innovation efficiency up enhance by 0. 0884%. From the mechanism of action, the positive effect of R&D outsourcing on innovation efficiency is mainly reflected in the improving rate of pure technological progress This suggests that R&D outsourcing is the best strategies for China's manufacturing industry in order to improve the innovation ability and successfully complete the transformation and upgrading in the post-crisis era.
出处 《数量经济技术经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期53-69,共17页 Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics
基金 国家社科基金青年项目"我国服务业二元结构及其对城市居民收入分配的影响研究"(13CJL021)的阶段性成果
关键词 研发外包 创新能力 创新效率 Research and Development Outsourcing Innovation Ability Innovation Efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Amiti M. , Wei S. J. , 2005, Fear of Service Outsourcing : Is It Justified? [J], Economic Policy, 20 (42): 308-347.
  • 2Amiti M. , Wei S.J. , 2009, Service Offshoring and Productivity: Evidence from the US [J], The World Economy, 32 (2) : 203-220.
  • 3Bhagwati J., Panagariya A., Srinivasan T. N., 2004, The Muddles over Outsourcing [J], The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18 (4) : 93-114.
  • 4Crino R. , 2009, O f f shoring , Multinationals and Labour Market : A Review of the Empirical Lit- erature ['J], Journal of Economic Surveys, 23 (2): 1974249.
  • 5Coe D. T. , Helpman E. , 1995, International R&D Spillovers [J], European Economic Review, 39 (5): 859-887.
  • 6] Coe D. T. , Helpman E. , Hoffmaister A. W. , 1997, North-South R & D Spillovers [J], The E- conomic Journal, 107 (440) : 134-149.
  • 7Deardorff A. V. , 2006, Comment on Mankiw and Swagel, "The Politics and Economics of Off- shore Outsourcing"[J], Journal of Monetary Economics, 53 (5) : 1057-1061.
  • 8Engelbrecht H.J., 1997, International R&D Spillovers, Human Capital and Productivity in OECD Economies : An Empirical Investigation [J], European Economic Review, 41 (8)1479-1488.
  • 9Grossman G. M. , Helpman E. , 1991, Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy [M], The MIT Press, Cambridge.
  • 10Hijzen A. , Inui T. , Todo Y. , 2010, Does Offshoring Pay? Firm-Level Evidence from Japan [J], Economic Inquiry, 48 (4): 880-895.

二级参考文献188

共引文献857

同被引文献576

引证文献39

二级引证文献191

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部