期刊文献+

系统功能语言学中的复杂自适应系统思想探析 被引量:4

The application of the theory of Complex Adaptive System in Systemic Functional Linguistics
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文从复杂自适应系统理论视角出发,重新解读了系统功能语言学的核心思想和重要理论,认为该学派自创立之初就渗透着复杂自适应系统思想,这正是它具有很强的包容性和纳入度的原因。本文认为应该把复杂自适应系统思想纳入系统功能语言学理论,作为一种认识论和方法论,以阐释语义发生的演化机制,进一步夯实其哲学基础,为其与别的学科进行互补与整合研究提供理论基石。同时,基于复杂自适应系统理论的语言观作为新的科学观和方法论也为语言学研究提供了一种新的研究范式,推动语言学研究的复杂性科学转向,使人们更加深刻认识到语言研究的理论目标。 This paper examines the core thoughts and major theories of systemic functional linguistics(SFL) by envisaging language as a complex adaptive system(CAS), holding that SFL has been saturated with the conception of CAS at the outset, which accounts for its theoretical compatibility and interdisciplinarity. It is ar gued that the CAS theory should be incorporated into SFL both as a new epistemology and methodology,so as to address the mechanism of semogenesis, lay a solid philosophical foundation for SFL, and then provide the theoretical basis for the complementation and integration between SFL and other related disciplines.It is also noted that the position of viewing language as a CAS provides a new research paradigm for linguistics, thus promoting a new turn in light of complexity science and enhancing our understanding of the theoretical goal of linguistic research.
机构地区 西南大学
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期48-57,146,共10页 Modern Foreign Languages
基金 重庆市人文社会科学重点研究基地重点项目"语义发生的复杂自适应系统视角研究"(059)的阶段性成果 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目资助(SWU1409274)
关键词 系统功能语言学 复杂自适应系统 语义发生 研究范式 SFL CAS semogenesis research paradigm
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Beckner, C., R. Blythe, M. H. Christiansen, W. Croft, N. C. Ellis, J. Holland, J. Ke, D. Larsen-Freeman & T. Shoenemann. 2009. Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper [A]. In N. C. Ellis & D. Larsen-Freeman (eds.). Language as a Complex Adaptive System I C ]. Language Learning Research Club, University of Michigan, 1-26.
  • 2Edelman, G. 1992. Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of the Mind [M]. New York: Basic books.
  • 3Ellis, N. C. & D. Larsen-Freeman (eds.). 2009. Language as a Complex Adaptive System [C]. Language Learning Research Club, University of Michigan.
  • 4Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning E M ]. London: Arnold.
  • 5Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. Context of situation [A]. In M. A. K. HaUiday & R. Hasan (eds.). Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective [ C]. Geelong, Australia : Deakin University.
  • 6Halliday, M A. K. 1992 [ 1995/2007 ]. On language in relation to the evolution of human [A]. First published in S. All6n (ed.). Of Thoughts and Words (Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 92: The Relation between Language and Mind) [C]. London: Imperial College Press and the Nobel Foundation, 1995.
  • 7Halliday, M. A. K. 2004. The language of early childhood [ A ]. In J. J. Webster (ed). Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday , Vol. 4 [C]. London: Continuum.
  • 8Halliday, M. A. K. 2008. Complementarities in Language [M]. Beijing- The Commercial Press.
  • 9HaUiday, M. A. K. 2014. Halliday's Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.) [M]. Revised by C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. London: Routledge.
  • 10Halliday, M. A. K. & C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. 1999. Construing Experience Through Meaning: A Language-Based Approach to Cognition[M]. London and New York: Continuum.

二级参考文献65

  • 1黄甫全.国外课程整合的发展走势及其启示[J].比较教育研究,1997(3):39-42. 被引量:74
  • 2严世清.论韩礼德的语言哲学思想[J].外语研究,2002,19(2):7-10. 被引量:46
  • 3徐烈炯.功能主义与形式主义[J].外国语,2002,25(2):8-14. 被引量:43
  • 4Halliday, M.A.K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Edward and Arnold.
  • 5Halliday, M.A.K. 1992. How do you mean? [A]. In M. Davies&L. Ravelli (eds.). Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice [C]. London: Pinter Publishers. 20-35.
  • 6Halliday, M. A. K. & C. Matthiessen. 1999. Construing Experience through Meaning: A Languange-based Approach to Cognition [M]. London: Continuum.
  • 7Akman, V. 2000. Rethinking Context as a social construct [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 743-759.
  • 8Allen, J. 1995. Natural Language Understanding[M]. Redwood City, CA:Benjamin/Cummings.
  • 9Beaugrande, R. 1980. Text, Discourse and Process:Towards a multi-disciplinary science of texts [M].London: Longman.
  • 10Brown, G. & G. Yule. 1983. Discourse Analysis [M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

共引文献394

同被引文献31

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部