期刊文献+

兴奋剂处罚与运动员权利保障的冲突与协调 被引量:12

Protection of Athletes' Right and Anti-doping Sanctions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对体育领域使用兴奋剂的行为进行处罚,以保障赛场洁净,保护运动员健康,维护运动公平,为各国体育界共识,并在国际和国内层面形成一系列兴奋剂处罚规则。然而,兴奋剂检测与处罚规则尚存有瑕疵,给运动员造成负担,运动权利受到影响,并产生大量纠纷。因此,完善反兴奋剂规则,调整归责原则和检测方法,保障运动员的质疑及申诉权,是平衡兴奋剂处罚与运动员权利保护的重要方式。 It is the common consensus in the sports field of the world that sanctions of drugs aim to purify games, protect athletes' health and maintain justice, a series of rules and regulations have been formed, to sanctions in sporting fields. However, there are also some flaws in doping control and punishment, creating burdens to ath- letes' sports rights and leading to a lot of disputes. Therefore, the vital way to balance anti - doping sanctions and protect athletes' sports right is to perfect rules of anti - doping, regulate liability and methods of testing and assure reasonable questioning and appealing right of athletes.
作者 李智
机构地区 福州大学法学院
出处 《成都体育学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期48-54,共7页 Journal of Chengdu Sport University
关键词 兴奋剂处罚 运动员权利 严格责任 sanction athlete's rights strict liability
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Matthew Hard. Caught in the Net: Athletes' rights and the World Anti- doping Agency [ J ]. Southern California Interdisciplinary, 2010,19 ( 1 ).
  • 2Michael A. Hiltzik. Presumed Guilty : Athletes Unbeatable Foe, Part 1, L.A. Times[ EB/OL]. http://www, latimes, corn/news! loeal/la- sp - dopinglOdeelO, O, 3464145. story? coil = la - headlines - california. 2006 -09 - 10.
  • 3Christopher S. Groleau. Weird Science: A Look at the World Anti - Doping Agency's Questionable Testing Methods and the Need for Change to Protect International Athletes [ J ]. Quinnipiac Health Law Journal,2009 (13).
  • 4李智,王美烟.正当程序视野下国际体育兴奋剂处罚体系的发展[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010,63(3):408-415. 被引量:7
  • 5Richard H. McLaren, CAS Jurisprudence: What Can We Learn? [ EB/OL ]. http ://www. wada - ama. org/rtecontent/document/ McLaren learn, pdf. 2012 - 08 - 28.
  • 6Donald Berry. The Science of Doping[ J]. Nature, 2008.
  • 7Robyn R. Goldstein. An American in Paris: The Legal Framework of International Sport and the Implications of the World Anti - Do- ping Code on Accused Athletes[ J]. Virginia Sports and Entertain- ment Law Journal 2007 (7).
  • 8Michael A. Hiltzik. WADA Doesn "t Mind Being Overshadowed [ N]. L. A. Times, 2007 - 11 - 16.
  • 9See Sandis Prusis v. IOC, Arbitration CAS ad hoc Division (O. G. Salt Lake City 2002) 001.
  • 10Gundel v. FEI, Swiss Federal Tribunal, Decision of 15 March 1993.

二级参考文献6

  • 1余宇,谢雪峰.第27届奥运会拉杜坎兴奋剂事件引发的法学思考[J].体育科学,2006,26(3):77-79. 被引量:5
  • 2Mitten, Matthew J. 2006. "From Grand Slams to Grand Juries= Performance-Enhancing Drug Use in Sports.. Symposium Contribution: Drug Testing of Athletes An Internal, Not External, Matter," New England Law Review 40.
  • 3Straubel, Michael S. 2002. "Doping Due Process: A Critique of the Doping Control Process in International Sport," Dickinson Law Review 106.
  • 4McLaren, Richard. 2004. "International Sports Law Perspective: The CAS AD HOC Division at the Athens Olympic Games," Marquette Sports Law Review 15.
  • 5Goldstein, Robyn R. 2007. "An American in Paris: The Legal Framework of International Sport and the Implications of the World Anti-Doping Code on Accused Athletes," Virginia Sports & Entertainment Law Journal 7.
  • 6李龙,徐亚文.正当程序与宪法权威[J].武汉大学学报(人文社会科学版),2000,53(5):631-636. 被引量:39

共引文献6

同被引文献205

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部